Abstract
Flip chips were assembled on to ceramic boards using eutectic tin‐lead solder with underfill and with/without encapsulation for temperature cycling and high‐temperature‐high‐humidity tests. After 1.5 years of testing, the reliability performance of the flip chip on board (FCOB) assemblies was compared. All of the FCOB assemblies with underfill, but without encapsulation, survived 5,778 cycles of the temperature cycling test following 5,005 hours of the high‐temperature and high‐humidity test. The results show that encapsulation may not necessarily enhance the reliability of flip chip assemblies and might therefore be omitted.
Subject
Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Condensed Matter Physics,General Materials Science,Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Condensed Matter Physics,General Materials Science
Reference7 articles.
1. Goh, K.S. (1999), “Chip on flex and flip chip on flex technology”, MSc dissertation of Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
2. Harper, C.A. (1997), Electronic Packaging & Interconnection Handbook, 2nd ed., McGraw‐Hill, New York, NY.
3. Lee, N‐C. (1999), “Optimizing the reflow profile via defect mechanism analysis”, Soldering & Surface Mount Technology, Vol. 11 No. 1, pp. 13‐20.
4. Määttänen, J., Palm, P. and Tuominen, A. (2000), “Reliability of flip chip components soldered on FR5 board”, Microelectronics International, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 27‐30.
5. Roesner, B. (1998), “The beneficial effect of underfilling on the reliability of flip‐chip joints”, Soldering & Surface Mount Technology, Vol. 10 No. 2, pp. 14‐18.
Cited by
16 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献