Author:
Goffnett Sean P.,Lepisto Lawrence,Hayes Randall
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to present a framework and a case that delineates the coordinated use of the socio-economic approach to management (SEAM) and Lean Six Sigma (LSS) to facilitate operational change.
Design/methodology/approach
– This study uses action research and thematic analysis to explore the augmentation of existing process improvement and organizational assessment methodologies in a production environment.
Findings
– Organizations are under increasing pressure to improve all aspects of business. Project leaders and consultants often follow popular quantitatively oriented protocols like LSS to evaluate explicit operational processes. Including a qualitatively oriented protocol like SEAM expands the project leader’s capability through greater consideration of implicit organizational issues. This paper presents a case where LSS was complemented by SEAM to assess a process that was entangled with several latent organizational dysfunctions.
Practical implications
– SEAM and LSS are accepted protocols to facilitate process improvement and organizational change. Pairing the two protocols into a SEAM-LSS model offers the strengths of each approach, while compensating for the limitations of each. The result is a more inclusive change protocol that reduces potential oversights and inefficiencies that could occur if project leaders worked within the purview of only one methodology.
Originality/value
– This paper uses action research to propose a model to bring qualitative and quantitative methodologies together into a larger complementary framework to use when evaluating organizational problems and opportunities. This paper aims to stimulate discussion and research that would lead to more robust process improvement protocols.
Subject
Strategy and Management,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference78 articles.
1. Amer, Y.
,
Ashraf, M.A.
,
Luong, L.
,
Lee, S.
and
Wang, W.Y.C.
(2007), “A systems approach to order fulfillment using design for six sigma methodology”,
International Journal of Business and Systems Research
, Vol. 1 No. 3, pp. 302-316.
2. Antony, J.
(2011), “Six Sigma vs Lean. Some perspectives from leading academics and practitioners”,
International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management
, Vol. 60 No. 2, pp. 185-190.
3. Argyris, C.
(1960),
Understanding Organization Behavior
, Dorsey, Homewood, IL.
4. Arnheiter, E.D.
and
Maleyeff, J.
(2005), “The integration of lean management and Six Sigma”,
The TQM Magazine
, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 5-18.
5. Atkinson, P.
(2010), “Lean is a cultural issue”,
Management Services
, Vol. 54 No. 2, pp. 35-41.
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献