Abstract
PurposeExcessive tool wear is responsible for damage or breakage of the tool, workpiece, or machining center. Thus, it is crucial to examine tool conditions during the machining process to improve its useful functional life and the surface quality of the final product. AI-based tool wear prediction techniques have proven to be effective in estimating the Remaining Useful Life (RUL) of the cutting tool. However, the model prediction needs improvement in terms of accuracy.Design/methodology/approachThis paper represents a methodology of fusing a feature selection technique along with state-of-the-art deep learning models. The authors have used NASA milling data sets along with vibration signals for tool wear prediction and performance analysis in 15 different fault scenarios. Multiple steps are used for the feature selection and ranking. Different Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) approaches are used to improve the overall prediction accuracy of the model for tool wear prediction. LSTM models' performance is evaluated using R-square, Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) parameters.FindingsThe R-square accuracy of the hybrid model is consistently high and has low MAE, MAPE and RMSE values. The average R-square score values for LSTM, Bidirection, Encoder–Decoder and Hybrid LSTM are 80.43, 84.74, 94.20 and 97.85%, respectively, and corresponding average MAPE values are 23.46, 22.200, 9.5739 and 6.2124%. The hybrid model shows high accuracy as compared to the remaining LSTM models.Originality/valueThe low variance, Spearman Correlation Coefficient and Random Forest Regression methods are used to select the most significant feature vectors for training the miscellaneous LSTM model versions and highlight the best approach. The selected features pass to different LSTM models like Bidirectional, Encoder–Decoder and Hybrid LSTM for tool wear prediction. The Hybrid LSTM approach shows a significant improvement in tool wear prediction.
Subject
Strategy and Management,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference62 articles.
1. Agogino, A. and Goebel, K. (2007), “Milling Data Set”, In U. B. BEST Lab (Ed.), NASA Ames Prognostics Data Repository, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, available at: http://ti.arc.nasa.gov/project/%0Aprognostic-data-repository.
2. Intelligent condition monitoring method for bearing faults from highly compressed measurements using sparse over-complete features;Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing,2018
3. A data-driven model for milling tool remaining useful life prediction with convolutional and stacked LSTM network;Measurement: Journal of the International Measurement Confederation,2020
4. Review of health prognostics and condition monitoring of electronic components;IEEE Access,2020
5. Machine ensemble approach for simultaneous detection of transient and gradual abnormalities in end milling using multisensor fusion;Journal of Materials Processing Technology,2009
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献