Abstract
PurposeExplainable artificial intelligence (XAI) has importance in several industrial applications. The study aims to provide a comparison of two important methods used for explainable AI algorithms.Design/methodology/approachIn this study multiple criteria has been used to compare between explainable Ranked Area Integrals (xRAI) and integrated gradient (IG) methods for the explainability of AI algorithms, based on a multimethod phase-wise analysis research design.FindingsThe theoretical part includes the comparison of frameworks of two methods. In contrast, the methods have been compared across five dimensions like functional, operational, usability, safety and validation, from a practical point of view.Research limitations/implicationsA comparison has been made by combining criteria from theoretical and practical points of view, which demonstrates tradeoffs in terms of choices for the user.Originality/valueOur results show that the xRAI method performs better from a theoretical point of view. However, the IG method shows a good result with both model accuracy and prediction quality.
Subject
Business and International Management,Strategy and Management
Reference88 articles.
1. Explaining individual predictions when features are dependent: more accurate approximations to Shapley values;Artificial Intelligence,2021
2. Peeking inside the black-box: a survey on explainable artificial intelligence (XAI);IEEE Access,2018
3. Gradient-based attribution methods,2019
4. Explainable artificial intelligence: an analytical review;WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery,2021
5. Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI): concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI;Information Fusion,2020
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献