When to choose ranked area integrals versus integrated gradient for explainable artificial intelligence – a comparison of algorithms

Author:

Singh VinayORCID,Konovalova Iuliia,Kar Arpan KumarORCID

Abstract

PurposeExplainable artificial intelligence (XAI) has importance in several industrial applications. The study aims to provide a comparison of two important methods used for explainable AI algorithms.Design/methodology/approachIn this study multiple criteria has been used to compare between explainable Ranked Area Integrals (xRAI) and integrated gradient (IG) methods for the explainability of AI algorithms, based on a multimethod phase-wise analysis research design.FindingsThe theoretical part includes the comparison of frameworks of two methods. In contrast, the methods have been compared across five dimensions like functional, operational, usability, safety and validation, from a practical point of view.Research limitations/implicationsA comparison has been made by combining criteria from theoretical and practical points of view, which demonstrates tradeoffs in terms of choices for the user.Originality/valueOur results show that the xRAI method performs better from a theoretical point of view. However, the IG method shows a good result with both model accuracy and prediction quality.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Business and International Management,Strategy and Management

Reference88 articles.

1. Explaining individual predictions when features are dependent: more accurate approximations to Shapley values;Artificial Intelligence,2021

2. Peeking inside the black-box: a survey on explainable artificial intelligence (XAI);IEEE Access,2018

3. Gradient-based attribution methods,2019

4. Explainable artificial intelligence: an analytical review;WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery,2021

5. Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI): concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI;Information Fusion,2020

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3