Author:
Baxter Stacey,Lowrey Tina M.
Abstract
PurposeChildren are bombarded by branded communication every day. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the role that particular linguistic devices play in communication, and whether this process differs between children and adults. One such device is phonetic symbolism, which has been shown to lead adults to prefer brand names whose phonetic attributes match product and/or brand features.Design/methodology/approachThree experiments were undertaken to examine children's (six to 12 years of age) preference for phonetically manipulated brand names. Experiment 1 replicates findings in previous research showing that preference for a particular brand name within a single product category is dependent on how the brand is described. Experiment 2 extends this research across product categories that are expected to lead to differential brand name preference (based on product features). Finally, experiment 3 investigates the interaction between pure phonetic symbolism and semantic information.FindingsChildren show similar patterns of brand name preference (with some age differences that could be attributable to developmental stages), and that they link particular sounds with specific brand/product attributes.Practical implicationsThis research shows that when selecting an inventive and distinct brand name, consideration could be given to the relationship between vowel sounds and brand characteristics. The authors believe that the findings are of importance to marketers as they consider different approaches to the naming of new brands.Originality/valueThis is the first set of experiments to investigate the effects of phonetic symbolism on brand name preference utilising a children's sample.
Subject
Marketing,Business and International Management
Reference22 articles.
1. Burgess, S.R. and Lonigan, C.J. (1998), “Bi‐directional relations of phonological sensitivity and pre‐reading abilities: evidence from a preschool sample”, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, Vol. 70 No. 2, pp. 117‐41.
2. Chall, J.S. (1989), “‘Learning to read: the great debate’ 20 years later: a response to ‘debunking the great phonics myth’”, The Phi Delta Kappan, Vol. 70 No. 7, pp. 521‐38.
3. Chaplin, L.N. and Lowrey, T.M. (2010), “The development of consumer‐based consumption constellations in children”, The Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 36 No. 5, pp. 757‐77.
4. Coulter, K.S. and Coulter, R. (2010), “A small sounds, big deals: phonetic symbolism effects in pricing”, The Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 37 No. 2, pp. 315‐28.
5. Ehri, L.C. and Wilce, L.S. (1985), “Movement into reading: is the first stage of print word learning visual or phonetic?”, Research Reading Quarterly, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 167‐79.
Cited by
27 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献