Author:
Bande Belén,Fernández-Ferrín Pilar,Varela-Neira Concepción,Otero-Neira Carmen
Abstract
Purpose
– Although servant leadership (SL) improves the overall effectiveness of individuals and teams, it remains understudied. The aim of this paper is to provide insight into the mediating mechanisms through which perceived SL affects salespersons’ proactive and adaptive behaviors.
Design/methodology/approach
– Data were gathered from 145 industrial salespeople and their supervisors across a variety of businesses and sectors in Spain.
Findings
– SL enhances salespeople’s adaptivity and proactivity by positively affecting their self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation. Furthermore, SL directly shapes the development of adaptive behaviors among salespeople, although this direct influence is not significant when considering proactivity. Additionally, the use of outcome-based control mechanisms enhances the positive effects of SL on salespeople’s intrinsic motivation.
Practical implications
– The results demonstrate that sales managers can promote more proactive and adaptive behaviors among sales staff by recognizing the importance of service and their moral responsibilities to the success of their subordinates.
Originality/value
– Cognitive evaluation theory was used to examine the direct and indirect effects of perceived SL on two emergent change-oriented behaviors (adaptivity and proactivity) using a matched sample of industrial salespeople from a variety of industries, thus providing a basis for the generalization of results. Moreover, in analyzing the moderating effects of outcome control, the conditions under which SL is more or less effective were examined.
Subject
Marketing,Business and International Management
Reference107 articles.
1. Amabile, T.M.
,
Hill, K.G.
,
Hennessey, B.A.
and
Tighe, E.M.
(1994), “The work preference inventory: assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientation”,
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
, Vol. 66 No. 5, pp. 950-967.
2. Amabile, T.M.
,
Conti, R.
,
Coon, H.
,
Lazenby, J.
and
Herron, M.
(1996), “Assessing the work environment for creativity”,
Academy of Management Journal
, Vol. 39 No. 5, pp. 1154-1184.
3. Anderson, E.
and
Oliver, R.L.
(1987), “Perspectives on behavior-based versus outcome-bases salesforce control systems”,
Journal of Marketing
, Vol. 51 No. 4, pp. 76-88.
4. Anderson, E.
and
Onyemah, V.
(2006), “How right should the customer be?”,
Harvard Business Review
, Vol. 84 Nos 7/8, pp. 58-67.
5. Anderson, J.C.
and
Gerbing, D.W.
(1988), “Structural equations model in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach”,
Psychological Bulletin
, Vol. 103 No. 3, pp. 411-423.
Cited by
72 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献