Author:
Dineva Denitsa,Daunt Kate L.
Abstract
Purpose
Research into the dark side of online brand-managed communities (OBCs) and, specifically, consumer-to-consumer (C2C) conflicts within this context are scarce. This paper aims to explore the different forms of C2C conflicts in OBCs, measure their direct impact on observing consumers and brands and investigate their appropriate moderation by exclusively focusing on two actors: brands versus consumers.
Design/methodology/approach
This research adopts a sequential exploratory approach. First, the authors capture different forms of C2C conflict via netnographic observations of five brand-managed communities. Second, the identified forms of C2C conflict are used in an online experiment to examine their impact on OBCs’ social and commercial outcomes. Third, further two online experiments were used to assess how brand versus consumer conflict moderators impact perceived credibility and conflict de-escalation.
Findings
The authors uncover three prominent forms of C2C conflict based on whether conflict occurs between supporters, non-supporters or outsiders of the OBC. The authors further show that these affect consumers’ engagement behaviours and emotional responses, while brands suffer from diminished credibility and could be targets of unfavourable electronic word-of-mouth. Finally, for managing C2C conflict, the findings confirm that brands are perceived as more suitable, while under certain conditions consumers can also be viewed as appropriate moderators.
Research limitations/implications
This research used a range of participant self-selected brands and is limited to brand-managed (as opposed to consumer-managed) communities on Facebook. While beyond the scope of this paper, the dynamics for consumer-managed communities may differ.
Practical implications
This article offers guidance to marketing practitioners on the different nuances of undesirable consumer interactions in brand-managed communities on social media, their impact on customer engagement and brand perceptions and when/whether brands or consumers may be suited to moderating these.
Originality/value
This paper makes novel contributions to the literature on consumer (mis)behaviours and OBC management. The findings are among the first, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, to examine the direct social and commercial consequences of C2C conflicts and to provide comparative insights into the appropriateness of two different moderators in OBCs.
Reference74 articles.
1. The influence of C2C communications in OBCs on customer purchase behaviour;Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,2010
2. Demythologizing consumption practices: how consumers protect their field-dependent identity investments from devaluing marketplace myths;Journal of Consumer Research,2010
3. Brand hate: a literature review and future research agenda;European Journal of Marketing,2022
4. The effects of online incivility and consumer-to-consumer interactional justice on complainants, observers, and service providers during social media service recovery;Journal of Interactive Marketing,2018
5. The predictive validity of multiple-item versus single-item measures of the same constructs;Journal of Marketing Research,2007