Harmonising training and development across an industry: the case of Australian rail

Author:

Short Tom,Harris Roger McL.

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to explore why harmonisation, given its potential, is so difficult to achieve. It analyses the issues and challenges in achieving harmonisation of training and development across an industry. Design/methodology/approach The approach was a meta-analysis of six research projects undertaken in the Australian rail industry. These projects varied in duration from 12-24 months. Between 2009 and 2013, rail employees in varying roles and levels of seniority, including middle managers, front-line supervisors, rail incident investigators, track workers and drivers, were interviewed (n = 176) and surveyed (n = 341). Findings The meta-analysis identified a range of characteristics associated with harmonisation. It uncovered three categories of harmonisation, seven types of risk modelled in a layered risk pyramid and analysed key structural, environmental and organisational barriers to harmonisation. The paper concludes that harmonisation struggles to gain strategic significance and is hampered by operational pragmatism. Research limitations/implications There are few published papers examining harmonisation across companies or based on meta-analyses, especially qualitatively. Despite limitations of insufficient detail to allow close analysis, potentially variable quality data across projects from which to develop a meta-analysis and the danger of comparing apples with oranges, more attempts using this approach would be helpful in gaining nuanced insights into an industry. Practical implications Achieving industry harmonisation requires significant change in the mindset of executives. To enhance the chances of harmonisation, there is need for a strong national entity with overview of the entire industry, high-quality training and development resources and activities and cost-benefit analyses and active campaigns. A major outcome of this research is the risk pyramid, which can be used by managers as a strategic evaluation tool. By using such tools based on sound research, leaders can be equipped to make informed decisions and reduce downstream risks. Originality/value This research has value in extending the literature in two main ways: through examining the notion of harmonisation across an industry as distinct from within organisations that has been the focus of most studies and through using qualitative meta-analysis in a field dominated by quantitative approaches. It analyses the grey areas between rhetoric about its potential and difficulties in its achievement.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Reference42 articles.

1. Towards a theory of harmonisation,2011

2. Australian Government (2014), “Communiqué for the COAG industry and skills council meeting: 26 September”, available at: http://industry.gov.au/AboutUs/Documents/COAG-Industry-and-Skills-Council/Communique-26-September-2014.pdf (accessed 4 November 2014).

3. Microeconomic reform and Australian productivity: exploring the links;Australian Government Productivity Commission (AGPC),1999

4. Australian Government Productivity Commission (AGPC) (2012), Impacts of COAG Reforms: Business Regulation and VET, Vol. 2, available at: www.pc.gov.au/projects/study/coag-reporting/report (accessed 4 June 2014).

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Standards formation and the implications for HRD;European Journal of Training and Development;2020-06-29

2. Industrial standardisation as a driver for cross-national convergence in training processes;European Journal of Training and Development;2019-09-02

3. Advancing national human resource development research: suggestions for multilevel investigations;Human Resource Development International;2018-04-05

4. Towards harmonized training in the Australian rail industry some key factors to consider;Development and Learning in Organizations: An International Journal;2017-11-06

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3