Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to promote and analytically verify an advanced assessment design to evaluate service quality (SQ) especially in postgraduate higher education.
Design/methodology/approach
This research adopts a quantitative approach through a survey method. A structured questionnaire was designed as a means for collecting data. Data were collected from 182 postgraduate students in an Egyptian higher education university. Data were examined by exploratory factor analysis to pinpoint the main irregularities explained by the extracted factors. Then, confirmatory factor analysis was carried out to filter the ratios and empirically test the assessment efficiency of the developed model.
Findings
The final model consists of 33 items loaded into eight dimensions for measuring performance-based SQ of the postgraduate higher education. The results are satisfactory in terms of unidimensionality, trustworthiness, and validity tests.
Research limitations/implications
Although the empirical results are significant, a comparative study can identify relative strengths and weaknesses of this model.
Practical implications
For improving postgraduate higher education institutions’ quality, this paper highlights some dimensions and attributes that should be considered.
Originality/value
The literature proposes that there is an opportunity to handle SQ from the point of view of postgraduate students covering different contexts to further build a more comprehensive structure specifically for postgraduate higher education SQ. This paper deals with this research gap with analytical confirmation within the context of postgraduate programs in an Egyptian university.
Subject
Strategy and Management,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference62 articles.
1. Abdullah, F. (2004), “The development of HEdPERF: a new measuring instrument of service quality for higher education sector”, paper presented at the Third Annual Discourse Power Resistance Conference: Global Issues Local Solutions, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, April 5-7.
2. HEdPERF versus SERVPERF: the quest for ideal measuring instrument of service quality in higher education sector;Quality Assurance in Education,2005
3. Measuring service quality in higher education: HEdPERF versus SERVPERF;Marketing Intelligence and Planning,2006
4. The relationship between service quality and retention within the automated and traditional contexts of retail banking;Journal of Service Management,2009
5. Service quality in postgraduate education;Quality Assurance in Education,2008
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献