What’s wrong with IVR system service? A spatial theorisation of customer confusion and frustration

Author:

Ellway Benjamin P.W.

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to re-examine the important question of what is wrong with interactive voice response (IVR) system service by expanding a spatially informed conceptualisation of virtual navigation which recognises the experience of movement within and through space. Design/methodology/approach – First, previous research on IVR systems is reviewed to highlight key themes to a service audience. Second, the metaphorical aspects of language used by the popular and trade press to describe IVR systems is examined. Usability and design issues are identified from previous research as a basis from reinterpreting them from a spatial perspective of navigation. Findings – Both figurative and conceptual spatial metaphors are used to describe the IVR system as an enclosed physical space, within which customers enter, feel stuck, get lost, or try to escape from. The usability issues of human memory, linearity, and feedback, can be reinterpreted from a spatial perspective as a basis for explaining confusion and frustration with IVR systems. Research limitations/implications – Since the paper is conceptual, further research is needed to empirically investigate different types and features of IVR systems. The possible influence of age and culture upon the spatial nature of experience is especially interesting topics for future study. Practical implications – The paper identifies the absence of space as an inherent limitation of IVR systems. It subsequently recommends that firms should provide spatial resources to support customer use of IVR systems, which is supported by the recent emergence of visual IVR. Originality/value – The paper introduces the broader literature on IVR systems to the service field as a basis for raising awareness about this ubiquitous technological component of telephone-based service delivery. It applies and develops a highly abstract conceptual perspective to examine and interpret the representation and experience of IVR systems, as a basis for explaining the confusion, frustration, and dislike of them.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Strategy and Management

Reference66 articles.

1. Asthana, S. , Singh, P. , Kumaraguru, P. , Singh, A. and Naik, V. (2012), “Tring! tring! – an exploration and analysis of interactive voice response systems”, paper presented at the 4th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction.

2. Balentine, B. (1999), “Re-engineering the speech menu”, in Gardner-Bonneau, D. and Blanchard, H.E. (Eds), Human Factors and Voice Interactive Systems , Springer, New York, NY, pp. 205-235.

3. Bartsch, S. (2012), Superior Customer Experience in Voice-to-Voice Encounters: Insights from Three Studies Regarding Interaction and Call Centre Management , Books on Demand Gmbh, Berlin.

4. Batt, R. (2000), “Strategic segmentation in front-line services: matching customers, employees and human resource systems”, International Journal of Human Resource Management , Vol. 11 No. 3, pp. 540-561.

5. Bocklund, L. and Bengtson, D. (2002), Call Centre Technology Demystified , Call Centre Press ICMI Inc., CO.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3