Multiple choice questions and essay questions in curriculum

Author:

Kaipa Roha MariamORCID

Abstract

PurposeMultiple-choice questions (MCQs) and essays and short answer questions are the most common assessment protocols instructors use in their classrooms. However, the reliability and validity of these assessment protocols are controversial. The current study employed a survey research design using Qualtrics to determine the faculty and student perspective on using MCQs and essay and short answer questions in their courses as well as their rationale for the preference.Design/methodology/approachEighty-five students and 67 faculty within the social sciences discipline participated in the study.Findings65% of the students strongly preferred MCQs over essays and short answer questions. However, faculty did not show a strong preference for one or the other form of assessment (52.30% selected essays and short answer questions, and 47.69% preferred MCQs) in their courses. The study also explores why the students and faculty prefer one form of assessment over the other.Research limitations/implicationsThe findings of this study helped to understand the current assessment practices in a classroom from a faculty and student perspective.Originality/valueThis is one of few studies that evaluated the faculty as well as student perspective on the use of MCQs and essays and short answer questions in the curriculum across the social science discipline.

Publisher

Emerald

Reference26 articles.

1. Medical students' assessment preferences at king faisal university, Saudi Arabia;Advances in Medical Education and Practice,2011

2. Patients don't come with multiple choice options: essay-based assessment in UME;Medical Education Online,2019

3. What can we do about essay exams?;Teaching Sociology,1988

4. A comparison of quantitative questions in open‐ended and multiple‐choice formats;Journal of Educational Measurement,1992

5. Bloom's taxonomy;Emerging perspectives on learning, teaching, and technology,2010

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3