Abstract
PurposeThe aim of this paper is to provide a framework to measure the response of blue‐collar workers to new technology in manufacturing and to establish the relationship between learning culture and that response.Design/methodology/approachThe data were collected with a survey questionnaire from 12 manufacturing sites that were implementing a number of diverse new technologies. The dimensions of worker response were identified with exploratory factor analysis and the relationship between these factors and learning culture was established with path analysis.FindingsFactor analysis identified seven dimensions of worker response: disgruntlement, job‐security concerns, accommodation, informal learning, resistance, discussion, and formal learning. Learning culture had a large, statistically significant relationship with disgruntlement and medium, statistically significant relationships with job‐security concerns, accommodation, informal learning, and formal learning.Research limitations/implicationsThe sample was limited to manufacturing locations in the southeastern USA and the respondents were almost all male and either White or African‐American.Practical implicationsThese findings establish a strong positive relationship between learning culture and behavioral, affective and cognitive responses of workers to new technology. This is key for supporting learning culture in organizations that naturally are inclined to worker isolation and independence.Originality/valueEmpirical work of this nature is limited in manufacturing facilities. These organizations tend to be closed to research because of concerns regarding the security of proprietary information or the personal safety of the researcher.
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Development,Social Psychology
Reference19 articles.
1. Ayas, K. (1996), “Design for learning and innovation”, Long Range Planning, Vol. 29, pp. 898‐901.
2. Barton, H. and Delbridge, R. (2006), “Delivering the ‘learning factory’? Evidence on HR roles in contemporary manufacturing”, Journal of European Industrial Training, Vol. 30, pp. 385‐95.
3. Davis, F.D. (1986), A Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End‐user Information Systems: Theory and Results, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
4. Haasen, A. and Slocum, J.W. Jr (1996), “Opel Eisenach GMBH – creating a high‐productivity workplace”, Organizational Dynamics, Vol. 24, pp. 80‐5.
5. Havelock, R.G. and Havelock, M.C. (1973), Training for Change Agents: A Guide to the Design of Training Programs in Education and Other Fields, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Cited by
17 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献