Towards lean transformation: the analysis of lean implementation frameworks

Author:

Chay TickFei,Xu YuChun,Tiwari Ashutosh,Chay FooSoon

Abstract

Purpose – Failure in engaging shop floor employees (including supervisory staff) in lean, lacking of supervisory skills in leading workers and lacking of lean technical knowhow among the shop floor employees are some of the major obstacles in lean transformation. One of the reasons of inefficient lean transformation is the shortages in frameworks or plans in implementing lean. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the shortfalls in the current lean implementation frameworks. Design/methodology/approach – The frameworks were analysed according to the following criteria: first, “What” is the approach of lean implementation, i.e. top-down or bottom-up; second, “How” to implement lean (description of steps or sequences of lean implementation along the lean journey); third, “Why” – the reason of adoption of the proposed lean tools, techniques or practices (thereafter TTPs) in each phase of lean implementation; and fourth, “Who” are the targeted internal stakeholders to use or apply the lean TTPs that were proposed in the frameworks. Findings – Most of the current available lean frameworks were prone to top-down approach but not bottom-up. Improvement initiatives from the shop floor employees were often overlooked by researchers. In proposing their frameworks, most of the researchers have neglected the importance of “Why” aspect in the adoption of TTPs or the framework itself without giving the “reason” for each of the elements in lean implementation. Besides the aspects of “What” and “How”, the mentioned “Why” aspect is important in contributing to capability building among the shop floor employees in carrying out improvement, problem-solving or waste elimination activities. The aspect of “Who should carry out which lean TTP” was somewhat not emphasised by most of the lean researchers. In addition, the current frameworks were prone to “one-best-way” approach with lacking of contingency sense, which is one of the common criticisms against Lean Production System. Originality/value – This paper provides a critical view on the shortfalls of current lean implementation frameworks, and proposes an insight of new criteria for future research in analysing and proposing new lean implementation framework towards lean transformation.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Strategy and Management,Computer Science Applications,Control and Systems Engineering,Software

Reference65 articles.

1. Anand, G. and Kodali, R. (2009), Development of a framework for lean manufacturing systems”, International Journal of Services and Operations Management , Vol. 5 No. 5, pp. 687-716.

2. Anand, G. and Kodali, R. (2010), “Analysis of lean manufacturing frameworks”, Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Systems , Vol. 9 No. 1, pp. 1-30.

3. Anvari, A. , Norzima, Z. , Rosnah, M.Y. , Seyed Mohammad, H.H. and Yusof, I. (2011), “A proposed dynamic model for a lean roadmap”, African Journal of Business Management , Vol. 5 No. 16, pp. 6727-6737.

4. Bhasin, S. (2012), “Prominent obstacles to lean”, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management , Vol. 61 No. 4, pp. 403-425.

5. Bortolotti, T. and Romano, P. (2012), “Lean first, then automate: a framework for process improvement in pure service companies: a case study”, Production Planning & Control: The Management of Operations , Vol. 23 No. 7, pp. 513-522.

Cited by 40 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3