Prominent obstacles to lean

Author:

Bhasin Sanjay

Abstract

PurposeThis article aims to explore that despite the prominence of lean since 1990, there still exist ambiguous perceptions about the prominent obstacles preventing organisations either adopting lean or thwarting its wider implementation.Design/methodology/approachA total of 68 UK manufacturing organisations operating lean were analysed in an effort to elucidate the factors contributing to the low numbers of successful lean conversions. Surveys were utilised as part of the research methodology supplemented with seven extensive case studies in a validating exercise.FindingsThe prominent barriers are clearly identified in relation to the organisation's size, which should assist organisations about to embark upon their respective lean journeys. The preventative proposals should improve the implementation records.Research limitations/implicationsThe research focuses on manufacturing organisations in the UK, and should greatly benefit companies and managers in their respective lean endeavours.Practical implicationsWhile the barriers were identified, their prominence and type varied amongst the sizes of the organisation. Equally, remedial strategies are proposed to improve the poor implementation record.Social implicationsIn the UK a successful implementation rate of less than 10 per cent is not beneficial for either employees or employers, and is accompanied by a poor use of the external and internal funding available to organisations embarking upon lean.Originality/valueThe preventative strategies should greatly benefit lean managers and improve the poor implementation rates in the UK. Correlating the barriers encountered to the size of an organisation would aid this process.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Strategy and Management,General Business, Management and Accounting

Reference53 articles.

1. Anderson, V. (2007), Research Methods in HRM, Chartered Institute for Personnel and Development, London.

2. Atkinson, P. (2010), “Lean is a cultural issue”, Management Services, Vol. 54, pp. 35‐44.

3. Baker, P. (2002), “Why is lean so far off?”, Works Management, Vol. 8, pp. 6‐15.

4. Bicheno, J. and Holweg, M. (2009), The Lean Toolbox, Picsie, Buckingham.

5. Birkinshaw, J., Hamel, G. and Mol, M. (2008), “Management innovation”, The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 33, pp. 825‐41.

Cited by 154 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3