Author:
Sean Chong Yit,Ahmed Pervaiz
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to explore the complex nature of perceived quality by employing a phenomenological study to understand the meaning of University Service Quality (USQ) as experienced by the business undergraduate students.
Design/methodology/approach
– The paper employs a phenomenological study to understand the meaning of USQ from the undergraduate students’ perspective. In-depth interviews were conducted with 15 business undergraduates from public universities, local private universities and a foreign branch campus in Malaysia. Data gathered were analysed using the procedure suggested by Colaizzi (1978) for descriptive phenomenological analysis.
Findings
– From the qualitative data, the essential structure of the USQ experience was constructed based on five major themes which are “USQ as a luxury”, “USQ as citizenship rights”, “USQ as nurturing apprentices”, “USQ as administrative relief” and “USQ as utility consumption”. The findings suggest that students’ service quality experiences could be understood as a multi-faceted phenomenon with students expressing context-dependent service expectations and outcomes.
Practical implications
– The outcome of the paper highlights the nature of students’ expectations which may vary according to service contexts, and their perception of self. Therefore, an integrated effort in various service domains is necessary to enhance service quality experience in higher education.
Originality/value
– Although previously explored by Dabholkar et al. (1996) in the retail services, the phenomenological-based methodology is rather uncommon in the service quality inquiry, particularly in the higher education context. The insights gathered from the phenomenological study provided access to understanding some persistent issues in USQ such as standards of expectations and perceived role by students in the higher education.
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Education,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Education
Reference44 articles.
1. Abdullah, F.
(2006), “The development of HEdPERF: a new measuring instrument of service quality for the higher education sector”, International Journal of Consumer Studies, Vol. 30 No. 6, pp. 569-581.
2. Alves, H.
and
Raposo, M.
(2007), “Conceptual model of student satisfaction in higher education”, Total Quality Management, Vol. 18 No. 5, pp. 571-588.
3. Angell, R.J.
,
Heffernan, T.W.
and
Megicks, P.
(2008), “Service quality in postgraduate education”, Quality Assurance in Education, Vol. 16 No. 3, pp. 236-254.
4. Arokiasamy, L.
,
Ismail, M.
,
Ahmad, A.
and
Othman, J.
(2009), “Background of Malaysian private institutions of higher learning and challenges faced by academics”, The Journal of International Social Research, Vol. 2 No. 8, pp. 60-67.
5. Athiyaman, A.
(1997), “Linking student satisfaction and service quality perception: the case of university education”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 31 No. 7, pp. 528-540.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献