Author:
Chaplin Eddie,McCarthy Jane,Forrester Andrew
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to examine the role of liaison and diversion services working in the lower courts (also known as Magistrates’ courts) with regard to autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) and their assessment, in particular, the role of pre-sentence and psychiatric reports and interviews.
Design/methodology/approach
Current practice is described in the lower courts in the context of current legislation and procedures.
Findings
When writing reports, there is a need for expertise to offer an opinion on future risk, disposal and what needs to be in place to support people with ASDs. No assumptions should be made when reporting on the basis of an ASD diagnosis alone and each case must be assessed on its individual merits while ensuring that individual human rights are protected.
Originality/value
There is currently a sparse literature examining ASD in court settings. This paper seeks to clarify the current practice.
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health,Cognitive Neuroscience,Clinical Neurology,Neurology,Developmental and Educational Psychology
Reference33 articles.
1. Experiences of prison inmates with autism spectrum disorders and the knowledge and understanding of the spectrum amongst prison staff: a review;Journal of Intellectual Disabilities and Offending Behaviour,2015
2. A justice system failing the autistic community;Journal of Intellectual Disabilities and Offending Behaviour,2013
3. Autism spectrum disorder and offending – a UK perspective;Autism Spectrum Quarterly,2014
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献