A realist evaluation of an enhanced court‐based liaison and diversion service for defendants with neurodevelopmental disorders

Author:

Chaplin Eddie1ORCID,McCarthy Jane23ORCID,Marshall‐Tate Karina4,Ali Salma5,Harvey Denise1ORCID,Childs Jessica6,Xenitidis Kiriakos7,Srivastava Samir4,McKinnon Iain8ORCID,Robinson Louise910,Allely Clare S.11ORCID,Hardy Sally12ORCID,Forrester Andrew13ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Health and Social Care London South Bank University London UK

2. University of Auckland Auckland New Zealand

3. King's College London London UK

4. South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust London UK

5. West London NHS Trust London UK

6. HMP Whitemoor March UK

7. Medical Member HM Courts and Tribunals Service London UK

8. Newcastle University Newcastle upon Tyne UK

9. Lancashire and South Cumbria NHS Foundation Trust Preston UK

10. University of Manchester Manchester UK

11. University of Salford Manchester UK

12. NICHE Anchor Institute University of East Anglia East Anglia UK

13. Cardiff University Cardiff UK

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundIn England, court‐based mental health liaison and diversion (L&D) services work across courts and police stations to support those with severe mental illness and other vulnerabilities. However, the evidence around how such services support those with neurodevelopmental disorders (NDs) is limited.AimsThis study aimed to evaluate, through the lens of court and clinical staff, the introduction of a L&D service for defendants with NDs, designed to complement the existing L&D service.MethodsA realist evaluation was undertaken involving multiple agencies based within an inner‐city Magistrates' Court in London, England. We developed a logic model based on the initial programme theory focusing on component parts of the new enhanced service, specifically training, screening, signposting and interventions. We conducted semi‐structured interviews with the court staff, judiciary and clinicians from the L&D service.ResultsThe L&D service for defendants with NDs was successful in identifying and supporting the needs of those defendants. Benefits of this service included knowledge sharing, awareness raising and promoting good practice such as making reasonable adjustments. However, there were challenges for the court practitioners and clinicians in finding and accessing local specialist community services.ConclusionA L&D service developed for defendants with NDs is feasible and beneficial to staff and clinicians who worked in the court setting leading to good practice being in place for the defendants. Going forward, a local care pathway would need to be agreed between commissioners and stakeholders including the judiciary to ensure timely and equitable access to local services by both defendants and practitioners working across diversion services for individuals with NDs.

Funder

Guy's and St Thomas' Charity

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Psychology (miscellaneous),General Medicine,Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Prison Psychiatry;Seminars in Forensic Psychiatry;2024-06-13

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3