Styles of adaptation
Author:
Hansen William B.,Pankratz Melinda M.,Dusenbury Linda,Giles Steven M.,Bishop Dana C.,Albritton Jordan,Albritton Lauren P.,Strack Joann
Abstract
PurposeTo be effective, evidence‐based programs should be delivered as prescribed. This suggests that adaptations that deviate from intervention goals may limit a program's effectiveness. This study aims to examine the impact that number and quality of adaptations have on substance use outcomes.Design/methodology/approachThe authors examined 306 video recordings of teachers delivering “All Stars”, a middle school drug prevention program. Multiple observers coded each recording, noting the number and type of adaptation each teacher made. Each adaptation was given a valence rating. Adaptations that were deleterious to program goals received negative valence ratings; positive ratings were given for adaptations that were likely to facilitate achievement of program goals; neutral ratings were given to adaptations that were expected to have neither a positive nor negative impact on program goals.FindingsAll teachers made adaptations. Teachers were consistent across time in the types of adaptations they made, suggesting each teacher has a personalized style of adapting. Those who made few adaptations, and whose average adaptation was rated as being positive had a higher percentage of students who remained non‐drug users. In contrast, teachers who made many adaptations, whether their average valence rating was positive, neutral or negative, failed to have as many students remain non‐drug users. Measures of fidelity, including quality of delivery and teacher understanding, were related to valence of adaptations, with better performance related to making positive adaptations.Practical implicationsThrough training and supervision, teachers should be guided and encouraged to follow programs directions, making few adaptations and ensuring that adaptations that are made advance the goals of intervention. Programs should define acceptable and unacceptable ways they may be adapted.Originality/valueThis study provides significant evidence about the challenges that face disseminated evidence‐based programs.
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Education
Reference47 articles.
1. Backer, T.E. (2001), Finding the Balance: Program Fidelity and Adaptation in Substance Abuse Prevention, A State‐Of‐The‐Art Review, Center for Substance Abuse Prevention, Rockville, MD. 2. Barrera, M., Castro, F. and Steiker, L. (2011), “A critical analysis of approaches to the development of preventive interventions for subcultural groups”, American Journal of Community Psychology, Vol. 48 No. 3, pp. 439‐454. 3. Blakely, C.H., Mayer, J.P., Gottschalk, R.G., Schmitt, N., Davidson, W.S., Roitman, D.B. and Emshoff, J.G. (1987), “The fidelity‐adaptation debate: implications for the implementation of public sector social programs”, American Journal of Community Psychology, Vol. 15 No. 3, pp. 253‐268. 4. Botvin, G.J. and Griffin, K.W. (2007), “School‐based programs to prevent alcohol, tobacco and other drug use”, International Review of Psychiatry, Vol. 19 No. 6, pp. 607‐615. 5. Bowen, S.‐A.K., Saunders, R.P., Richter, D.L., Hussey, J., Elder, K. and Lindley, L. (2010), “Assessing levels of adaptation during implementation of evidence‐based interventions: Introducing the Rogers – Rütten Framework”, Health Education and Behavior, Vol. 37 No. 6, pp. 815‐830.
Cited by
40 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|