Linguistic performance and legibility of auditors’ reports with modified opinions

Author:

Fakhfakh Mondher

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to measure the understandability of the illustrations provided by the International Federation of Accountants in terms of the structural features of international auditors’ reports with modified opinions. Design/methodology/approach – Measurement of the legibility of reports illustrated by the revised ISA 705 and ISA 706. This paper discusses the compliance level of modified auditors’ reports with the linguistic rules. Findings – It was found that the standardized illustrations of modified reports are not fully understandable by users of financial statements. The illustrations of modified auditors’ reports are not compliant with several linguistic rules. Originality/value – This paper provides new original investigation about the linguistic features of illustrations provided by the ISA 705 and ISA 706. This paper discusses the level of unintelligibility of standardized auditors’ reports and the implications for stakeholders.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Finance,Accounting

Reference18 articles.

1. De Landsheere, G. (1963), “Pour une application des tests de lisibilité de Flesch à la langue française”, Le Travail Humain , Vol. 26 Nos 1-2, pp. 141-154.

2. DuBay, W.H. (2004), The Principles of Readability , Costa Mesa, CA, available at: www.impactinformation.com/impactinfo/readability02.pdf

3. Fakhfakh, M. (2013), “The readability of standardised reports by the international federation of accountants”, Journal of Commerce and Accounting Research , Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 10-27.

4. GélinasChebat, C. , Macot, M. , Préfontaine, C. and Daoust, F. (1991), “La lisibilité de documents d’information du ministère de la Main d’oeuvre, de la Sécurité du revenu et de la Formation professionnelle”, Avis professionnel présenté au ministère de la Main d’oeuvre, de la Sécurité du revenu et de la Formation professionnelle, Gouvernement du Québec, p. 50.

5. Gray, W.S. and Leary, B.W. (1935), What Makes a Book Readable , University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3