Author:
Assarlind Marcus,Aaboen Lise
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to identify forces (in the form of converters and inhibitors) of Lean Six Sigma adoption by studying the gradual adoption of Lean Six Sigma in a medium-sized Swedish manufacturing company. The paper suggests how the converters and inhibitors interact toward increased maturity of the adoption and, in this case, stagnation thereof.
Design/methodology/approach
– Thirteen interviews were recorded and analyzed to identify converters that were moving the process forward or backward, as well as inhibitors that caused it to linger.
Findings
– It was discovered that activities that had initially moved the process forward were not sufficient to move it beyond its current point. However, an increased knowledge of Lean Six Sigma throughout the organization now prevents the process from moving in the opposite direction. In this medium-sized Swedish manufacturing company, Lean Six Sigma becomes a framework for thought and communication during Lean work.
Research limitations/implications
– The study benefited from considering forces pushing the process forward as well as backward. Thus, the authors suggest that future studies will benefit from focusing beyond critical success factors that may at times are static in nature. As a limitation, for discussions about the past, the memories of interviewees, generally, may have a tendency to be biased.
Originality/value
– The paper contributes knowledge of Lean Six Sigma adoptions and how they may attain greater future success by reporting on difficulties and setbacks in the current gradual adoption process in a chosen company.
Reference73 articles.
1. Antony, J.
(2011), “Six Sigma vs Lean: some perspectives from leading academics and practitioners”, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Vol. 60 No. 2, pp. 185-190.
2. Arnheiter, E.D.
and
Maleyeff, J.
(2005), “The integration of lean management and Six Sigma”, The TQM Magazine, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 5-18.
3. Arumugam, V.
,
Antony, J.
and
Douglas, A.
(2012), “Observation: a Lean tool for improving the effectiveness of Lean Six Sigma”, The TQM Journal, Vol. 24 No. 3, pp. 275-287.
4. Arvidsson, M.
and
Gremyr, I.
(2008), “Principles of robust design methodology”, Quality and Reliability Engineering International, Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 23-35.
5. Assarlind, M.
(2010), “Exploring quality management implementation factors: in-depth study in one smaller company: “WashCo””, paper presented at the 13th QMOD Conference on Quality and Service Sciences, Cottbus.
Cited by
42 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献