Abstract
PurposeContinued identification with a former employer may provide valuable self‐enhancement during transition, or it may highlight unsettling self‐discontinuity. This study seeks to develop and test competing hypotheses regarding the extent to which continued organizational identification relates to psychological well‐being following involuntary job loss.Design/methodology/approachThe author conducted a two‐wave survey study spanning six months during the recent financial crisis in 2008 to test these hypotheses. Results are presented for 86 employees in two samples, 45 who were unemployed at the beginning of the study and 41 who lost their jobs during the study.FindingsContinued organizational identification positively related to psychological well‐being in both samples. In a post‐hoc analysis, this relationship held only for employees who attributed their job loss to themselves, rather than to external factors such as their organizations.Research limitations/implicationsThe results are based on a limited sample both in terms of size and scope; accordingly, they are best used to explain the relationships for the sample from which they were drawn, professional employees in the USA with a business education, about half of whom worked in the financial services industry.Practical implicationsBeing identified with an employing organization is not only beneficial for current employees and their organizations, but also helps employees whose jobs have been terminated. Managers and counselors should advise people to reflect upon, rather than distance themselves from, aspects of their identities based in former employers.Originality/valueThis is the first study to examine the role of organizational identification in individual response to involuntary job loss.
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Management Science and Operations Research,Applied Psychology,Social Psychology
Reference63 articles.
1. Ashforth, B.E. (2001), Role Transitions in Everyday Life: An Identity‐based Perspective, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
2. Ashforth, B.E. and Johnson, S. (2001), “Which hat to wear? The relative salience of multiple identities in organizational contexts”, in Hogg, M. and Terry, D.G. (Eds), Social Identity Processes in Organizational Contexts, Psychology Press, Philadelphia, PA, pp. 31‐48.
3. Ashforth, B.E. and Kreiner, G.E. (1999), “‘How can you do it?’: dirty work and the challenge of constructing a positive identity”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 24 No. 3, pp. 413‐34.
4. Ashforth, B.E. and Mael, F. (1989), “Social identity theory and the organization”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 20‐39.
5. Ashforth, B.E., Harrison, S.H. and Corley, K.G. (2008), “Identification in organizations: an examination of four fundamental questions”, Journal of Management, Vol. 34 No. 3, pp. 325‐74.
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献