Bringing the “right to request” flexible working arrangements to life: from policies to practices

Author:

Cooper Rae,Baird Marian

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to understand how the “right to request” flexible working arrangements (FWAs), located in national policy and in organisational policy contexts, are brought to life in the workplace by employees and their managers. The authors seek to understand the nature and content of requests, the process followed in attending to requests, the scope of the arrangements which resulted and the implications for the work of both employees and managers. Design/methodology/approach – The authors employ a case study method, investigating how formal “right to request” FWAs policies translate to practice within two large companies in Australia. The primary data focuses on 66 in-depth interviews with line managers, employees and key organisational informants. These interviews are triangulated with legislative, company and union policy documents. Findings – Most requests were made by mothers returning from maternity leave. Typically their requests involved an attempt to move from full-time to part-time hours. The authors found a considerable knowledge deficit among the employees making requests and a high level of informality in the processing of requests. As a result, managers played a critical role in structuring both the procedure and the substantive outcomes of FWAs requests. Managers’ personal experience and levels of commitment to FWAs were critical in the process, but their response was constrained by, among other things, conflicting organisational policies. Research limitations/implications – The scale of the empirical research is possibly limited by a focus on large companies in the private sector. Practical implications – The authors provide insight into the implementation gap between FWA policy and practice. The authors make suggestions as to how to make “right to request” policies more accessible and effective. Social implications – The “right to request” flexible working is an issue of critical importance to families, employees, managers, organisations and economies. Originality/value – “Right to request” FWAs are relatively new in legislation and policy and thus the authors have an incomplete understanding of how they operate and come to life at the workplace level. The authors show a significant implementation gap between policy and practice and point to some of the critical influences on this. Among other things, the authors build new insight in relation to the interaction of formal and informal and the role and place of the direct manager in the process of operationalising the “right to request”.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Industrial relations

Reference24 articles.

1. Acker, J. (2006), “Inequality regimes: gender, class, and race in organizations”, Gender & Society , Vol. 20 No. 4, pp. 441-464.

2. Aumann, K. , Galinsky, E. , Sakai, K. , Brown, M. and Bond, T. (2010), 2008 National Study of the Changing Workforce. The Elder Care Study: Everyday Realities and Wishes for Change , Families and Work Institute, New York, NY.

3. Aybars, A. (2007), “Work-life balance in the EU and leave arrangements across welfare regimes”, Industrial Relations Journal , Vol. 38 No. 6, pp. 569-590.

4. Baird, M. and Heron, A. (2013), “Women, work and elder care: new policies required for inclusive growth”, in Smyth, P. and Buchanan, J. (Eds), Inclusive Growth in Australia: Social Policy as Economic Investment , Allen and Unwin, Sydney, pp. 242-57.

5. Budd, J. and Mumford, K. (2006), “Family-friendly work practices in Britain: availability and perceived accessibility”, Human Resource Management , Vol. 45 No. 1, pp. 23-42.

Cited by 62 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The effect of flexible working arrangements on educator performance in Indonesia;International Journal of Educational Management;2024-09-03

2. The quest for a perfect hybrid working: A case study of Mars Wrigley Poland;Human Systems Management;2024-06-22

3. Flexible work arrangements in collective agreements: evidence from Spain and the Netherlands;Community, Work & Family;2024-06-10

4. Navigating the dual role of smartphones in e-work: enhancing productivity while managing distractions;Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research (JEECAR);2024-04-06

5. Advancing Work–Life Equality and Justice in the Asia–Pacific: Insights from Australia;Palgrave Studies in Equity, Diversity, Inclusion, and Indigenization in Business;2024

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3