Author:
Duncan Jennifer L.,Josiam Bharath M.,Kim Young Hoon,Kalldin Alexandria C.
Abstract
Purpose
– Focussing on behaviors and attitudes of casual dining patrons, the purpose of this paper is to use a factor-cluster approach to segment patrons into market groups and attempts to determine if differences exist in motivational factors among segments.
Design/methodology/approach
– Factor-cluster analysis is an alternative segmentation method to more traditionally used methods based on consumer demographics. Push and pull motivators were analyzed through factor analysis to determine important groupings. Then, to identify homogenous subgroups, k-means cluster analysis was conducted to segment 559 survey respondents based on factor importance.
Findings
– Three diverse groups were identified: Fraternizing Kitchen Fearfuls, Functional Feasters, and Foodie Fanatics. The various push and pull factors appeared to affect segments differently, with each cluster ascribing various importance levels to each of the factors used in the clustering approach.
Research limitations/implications
– Limitations include the use of a convenience sample and on-campus sampling. Future research should use random sampling methods and obtain surveys from sites not associated with a college campus.
Practical implications
– Though not often used in hospitality research, factor-cluster analysis can be useful to segment diners based on behavioral intentions and attributes, allowing marketers to more accurately target these diverse consumer segments. Marketing implications for casual dining restaurants are suggested.
Originality/value
– Using the involvement construct with push/pull motivators, this study groups respondents though factor-cluster analysis. Though used in tourism studies, factor-cluster analysis has yet to be studied in the context of casual dining restaurant patrons.
Subject
Food Science,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
Reference83 articles.
1. Baloglu, S.
and
Uysal, M.
(1996), “Market segments of push and pull motivations: a canonical correlation approach”,
International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management
, Vol. 8 No. 3, pp. 32-38.
2. Baltazar, A.
(2011), “Full-service restaurants need to differentiate”, Restaurant Management Magazine, available at: www.fsrmagazine.com/content/full-service-restaurants-need-differentiate (accessed January 15, 2013).
3. Becker-Suttle, C.B.
,
Weaver, P.M.
and
Crawford-Welch, S.
(1994), “A pilot study utilizing conjoint analysis in the comparison of age-based segmentation strategies in the full service restaurant market”,
Journal of Restaurant & Foodservice Marketing
, Vol. 1 No. 2, pp. 71-91.
4. Beldona, S.
,
Moreo, A.
and
Mundhra, G.
(2010), “The role of involvement and variety-seeking in eating out behaviors”,
International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management
, Vol. 22 No. 3, pp. 433-444.
5. Brennan, L.
and
Mavondo, F.
(2000), “Involvement: an unfinished story?”, in
O'Cass, A.
(Ed.),
ANZMAC Visionary Marketing for the 21st Century: Facing the Challenge
, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, November 28-December 3, pp. 132-137.
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献