Author:
Haider Jutta,Bawden David
Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this research is to investigate and critically assess the notions of “information poverty” in LIS by highlighting its connections with development discourse.Design/methodology/approachThe article takes a discourse analysis approach, which starts from Michel Foucault's understanding of discourse. “Information poverty” is posited as a statement and investigated in its relation to other statements. The focus is on discursive procedures that emerge from the repeated connections between statements. The article draws on the interpretative analysis of 35 English language articles published in scholarly and professional LIS journals between 1995 and 2005.Findings“Information poverty” and the “information poor” are established as being assigned specific positions in the discourse of LIS as the result of overlapping, sometimes conflicting discursive procedures. The concept emerges as a possibility in LIS by anchoring it in the dominant discourse of development. Traces of development discourse surface in LIS and contribute to the legitimisation of the concept of “information poverty” by lending it authority.Research limitations/implicationsThe material selection is linguistically biased. Results and findings are fully applicable only in an English language context.Originality/valueThe article relates the professional discourse of LIS to the dominant discourse of development and thus highlights some of the assumptions upon which the concept of “information poverty” is built. Moreover, the article is intended to contribute to the further development of discourse analysis in LIS.
Subject
Library and Information Sciences
Reference67 articles.
1. 1. Agboola, A.T. (2000), “Rural information supply and Nigerian agricultural libraries”, Rural Libraries, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 29‐37.
2. 2. Bowden, R. (2000), “The information rich and IFLA's information poor”, IFLA Journal, Vol. 26 No. 4, pp. 298‐302.
3. 3. Britz, J. (2004), “To know or not to know? A moral reflection on information poverty”, Journal of Information Science, Vol. 30 No. 3, pp. 192‐204.
4. 4. Buchanan, E. (1996), “Ethical transformations in a global information age”, Technical Services Quarterly, Vol. 13 Nos 3/4, pp. 23‐38.
5. 5. Cawkell, T. (1998), “The information age – for better or for worse?”, Journal of Information Science, Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 56‐8.
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献