Affiliation:
1. Department of Operations Research and Financial Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08540
2. Center for Theoretical Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139
3. Google Quantum AI, Venice, CA 90291
Abstract
Characterizing how neural network depth, width, and dataset size jointly impact model quality is a central problem in deep learning theory. We give here a complete solution in the special case of linear networks with output dimension one trained using zero noise Bayesian inference with Gaussian weight priors and mean squared error as a negative log-likelihood. For any training dataset, network depth, and hidden layer widths, we find non-asymptotic expressions for the predictive posterior and Bayesian model evidence in terms of Meijer-G functions, a class of meromorphic special functions of a single complex variable. Through novel asymptotic expansions of these Meijer-G functions, a rich new picture of the joint role of depth, width, and dataset size emerges. We show that linear networks make provably optimal predictions at infinite depth: the posterior of infinitely deep linear networks with data-agnostic priors is the same as that of shallow networks with evidence-maximizing data-dependent priors. This yields a principled reason to prefer deeper networks when priors are forced to be data-agnostic. Moreover, we show that with data-agnostic priors, Bayesian model evidence in wide linear networks is maximized at infinite depth, elucidating the salutary role of increased depth for model selection. Underpinning our results is a novel emergent notion of effective depth, given by the number of hidden layers times the number of data points divided by the network width; this determines the structure of the posterior in the large-data limit.
Funder
National Science Foundation
Publisher
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Reference57 articles.
1. Scaling description of generalization with number of parameters in deep learning
2. J. Kaplan et al . Scaling laws for neural language models. arXiv [Preprint] (2020). http://arxiv.org/abs/2001.08361.
3. Y. Bahri E. Dyer J. Kaplan J. Lee U. Sharma Explaining neural scaling laws. arXiv [Preprint] (2021) http://arxiv.org/abs/2102.06701.
4. J. W. Rae et al . Scaling language models: Methods analysis& insights from training gopher. arXiv [Preprint] (2021). http://arxiv.org/abs/2112.11446.
5. S. Arora N. Cohen N. Golowich W. Hu “A convergence analysis of gradient descent for deep linear neural networks” in ICLR (2019).
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献