Chemical Safety Assessment Using Read-Across: Assessing the Use of Novel Testing Methods to Strengthen the Evidence Base for Decision Making-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Chemical Safety Assessment Using Read-Across: Assessing the Use of Novel Testing Methods to Strengthen the Evidence Base for Decision Making

Published:2015-12 Issue:12 Volume:123 Page:1232-1240
ISSN:0091-6765
Container-title:Environmental Health Perspectives
language:en
Short-container-title:Environmental Health Perspectives

Author:

Berggren Elisabet¹,Amcoff Patric²,Benigni Romualdo³,Blackburn Karen⁴,Carney Edward⁵,Cronin Mark⁶,Deluyker Hubert⁷,Gautier Francoise⁸,Judson Richard S.⁹,Kass Georges E.N.⁷,Keller Detlef¹⁰,Knight Derek¹¹,Lilienblum Werner¹²,Mahony Catherine¹³,Rusyn Ivan¹⁴,Schultz Terry¹⁵,Schwarz Michael¹⁶,Schüürmann Gerrit¹⁷¹⁸,White Andrew¹⁹,Burton Julien¹,Lostia Alfonso M.¹,Munn Sharon¹,Worth Andrew¹

Affiliation:

1. Joint Research Centre, European Commission, Ispra, Italy

2. Cosmetics Europe, Brussels, Belgium

3. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development), Paris, France

4. Procter & Gamble, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA

5. The Dow Chemical Company, Midland, Michigan, USA

6. Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom

7. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), Parma, Italy

8. L’Oréal, Asnières-sur-Seine, France

9. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA

10. Henkel AG & Co, Düsseldorf, Germany

11. ECHA (European Chemicals Agency), Helsinki, Finland

12. SCCS (Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety), Luxembourg

13. Procter & Gamble, Egham, UK

14. Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA

15. The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA

16. Tübingen University, Tübingen, Germany

17. Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Leipzig, Germany

18. Institute for Organic Chemistry, Technical University Bergakademie Freiberg, Freiberg, Germany

19. Unilever PLC, Milton Keynes, United Kingdom

Publisher

Environmental Health Perspectives

Subject

Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Reference72 articles.

1. Adverse outcome pathways: A conceptual framework to support ecotoxicology research and risk assessment

2. The challenge of using read-across within the EU REACH regulatory framework; how much uncertainty is too much? Dipropylene glycol methyl ether acetate, an exemplary case study

3. Berggren E. 2014. SEURAT-1 proof-of-concepts. In: Towards the Replacement of in Vivo Repeated Dose Systemic Toxicity Testing. Vol. 4 (Gocht T Schwarz M eds). Le Perreux-sur-Marne France:Coach Consortium 86–93. Available: http://www.seurat-1.eu/media/download_gallery/SEURAT-1_Annual%20Report_Vol%204_HD.pdf [accessed 24 September 2014].

4. Case studies to test: A framework for using structural, reactivity, metabolic and physicochemical similarity to evaluate the suitability of analogs for SAR-based toxicological assessments

5. A framework to facilitate consistent characterization of read across uncertainty

Cited by 94 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) to Support Regulatory Decisions for Chemical Safety;FSA Research and Evidence;2024-09-10

3. A Systematic Analysis of Read-Across Adaptations in Testing Proposal Evaluations by the European Chemicals Agency;2024-08-30

4. Grouping of short alkyl-chain branched carboxylic acids for developmental toxicity;Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology;2024-08

5. Informing Hazard Identification and Risk Characterization of Environmental Chemicals by Combining Transcriptomic and Functional Data from Human-Induced Pluripotent Stem-Cell-Derived Cardiomyocytes;Chemical Research in Toxicology;2024-07-24