Affiliation:
1. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Abstract
This paper seeks to facilitate research on the processes of innovation and change in higher education, an area of scholarly endeavor which is attracting much interest of late. To meet this goal, a conceptual distinction is first drawn between the broad process of organizational change and the more specific processes of purposive change and innovation. Then, a typology of four research frameworks relevant to innovation and change is presented and illustrated through exemplary studies in the field of higher education. Using techniques of causal modeling, a prototypic flowgraph is constructed to capture the major features of each framework. Flowgraphs are cast in terms of posited relationships between generic variables which can be operationalized to suit the particular needs and setting of a given study. The authors further suggest that the most productive research on change and innovation in higher education will be based on sound theoretical reasoning employing combinations of the four frameworks. They argue that the specificity inherent in causal modeling can clarify important conceptual issues and thereby promote more informative investigation.
Publisher
American Educational Research Association (AERA)
Cited by
27 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Toward More Impactful International Business Education: A Teaching Innovation Typology;Journal of Teaching in International Business;2022-10-02
2. Unveiling the Inconvenient Truth;Enhancing Learning Design for Innovative Teaching in Higher Education;2020
3. Ontology-Based Measurement of Study Program Innovativeness in the Area of Economics and Management;Handbook of Research on Enhancing Innovation in Higher Education Institutions;2020
4. The Principal;The Wiley Handbook of Educational Supervision;2018-09-14
5. Comparing Pedagogical Innovations;Comparative Education Research;2014