Author:
Gentile Giulia,Lynskey Orla
Abstract
AbstractFour years following the entry into force of the EU data protection framework (the GDPR) serious questions remain regarding its enforcement, particularly in transnational contexts. While this transnational under-enforcement is often attributed to the role of key national authorities in the GDPR's procedures, this article identifies more systemic flaws. It examines whether the GDPR procedures are deficient-by-design and, if not, how these flaws might be addressed. The conclusions reached inform our understanding of how to secure effective protection of the EU Charter right to data protection. They are also of significance to EU law enforcement more generally given the increasing prevalence of composite decision-making as the mechanism of choice to administer EU law.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Law,Political Science and International Relations
Reference10 articles.
1. Understanding National Remedies and the Principle of National Procedural Autonomy: A Constitutional Approach;Halberstam;CYELS,2021
2. C-718/18 Commission v. Germany: Critical Reflections on the Independence of National Regulatory Authorities in EU Energy Law;Huhta;EEELR,2021
3. Rule-Making by the European Financial Supervisory Authorities: Walking a Tight Rope;Busuioc;ELJ,2013
4. To Be or Not to Be (Legally Binding)? Judicial Review of EU Soft Law after BT and Fédération Bancaire Française;Gentile;Revista de Derecho Comunitario Europeo,2021
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献