GDPR and the indefinable effectiveness of privacy regulators: Can performance assessment be improved?

Author:

Buckley Gerard1ORCID,Caulfield Tristan1ORCID,Becker Ingolf2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Computer Science, UCL , Gower Street, WC1E 6BT, London , United Kingdom

2. Department of Security & Crime Science, UCL , Gower Street, WC1E 6BT, London , United Kingdom

Abstract

Abstract Data protection regulations like the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) are increasingly important in securing individuals’ privacy as society goes digital. The success of any regulation, however good, ultimately depends on how well it is executed. Existing literature fails to answer what good execution means in this context. We research what practitioners think are the objectives of data protection regulators and how they evaluate their effectiveness. We explore novel ways to assess regulator performance more systematically. We surveyed 70 chief information security officers and conducted 23 structured interviews. The interviewees included informed business executives, lawyers, digital rights activists, and four national regulators. We supplement it with an analysis of diverse enforcement databases. Our findings indicate a mismatch between the broad presumed objectives attributed to regulators and the narrow criteria used to judge them in practice. Perception of the regulator’s effectiveness is subjective, sanctions-focused, and influenced by one’s role and responsibilities. Moreover, the independence of regulators, intentionally designed to insulate them from daily politics, raises serious questions of accountability. We examine the historical, cultural, and organizational motivations behind the current byzantine complexity of the GDPR regime. Lastly, we contribute a series of key performance indicators and make structural suggestions around centralized and standardized reporting of cases to deliver improved learning, legitimacy, transparency, and comparability. We believe our findings have important implications for the future development of regulator assessment and accountability in Europe and in the growing number of GDPR-like regimes outside Europe.

Funder

EPSRC

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Reference92 articles.

1. Setting the scene: the importance of regulatory policy;OECD,2011

2. Critical reflections on regulation [Plus a reply by Dimity Kingsford Smith];Black;Aust J Legal Phil,2002

3. Good practice guidance: Principles of effective regulation;National Audit Office,2021

4. Regulation and Its Reform

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3