Author:
Vanschoubroek F.,De Wilde R.,Lampo Ph.
Abstract
From the published data summarised in Table 1, it was calculated that, at an average degree of feed restriction of 15·8 %, daily weight gain decreased by 12·50% (or 0·78% for each 1% restriction), feed conversion efficiency improved by 3·96% (or 0·31% for each 1% restriction) and backfat thickness diminished by 7·63% (or 0·53% for each 1% restriction).Equations were calculated to show the degree to which daily weight gain, feed conversion efficiency and backfat thickness change with increasing feed restriction (Figures 1, 2 and 3).As the degree of feed restriction increases, the decrease in daily weight gain becomes relatively greater and the decrease in backfat thickness relatively smaller. Efficiency of feed utilisation, however, improves at first, but eventually decreases as restriction becomes more severe.It is thought that the equations found can be used, within certain limits, to calculate the average effects of feed restriction for different breeds of pigs, which when fed ad libitum consume 2·7 kg. meal ration (of normal composition) per day and have a growth rate of about 750 g. daily from 30 to 90 kg., and backfat thickness of about 37 mm. when kept under average environmental conditions.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Animal Science and Zoology
Reference14 articles.
1. Quantity and quality of final products other than milk—non-ruminants (pigs);Clausen;Fed. Proc.,1961
2. Hellberg A. , 1961a. Experiments with bacon pigs at different levels of nutrition. Proc. VIIIth int. Congr. Anim. Prod., Hamburg, Final Rep., pp. 258–263.
3. Feeding the Swedish way;Hellberg;Pig Farming,1961
4. Comparison of different levels of all-meal feeding for fattening pigs
5. The response of different types of pigs to varying levels of feeding from weaning to bacon weight, with particular reference to carcass quality
Cited by
36 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献