Comparison of different levels of all-meal feeding for fattening pigs

Author:

Braude R.,Mitchell K. G.,Cray A. S.,Franke A.,Sedgwick P. H.

Abstract

1. Results are reported of an experiment carried out under commercial conditions to obtain information on the effect of four different levels of allmeal feeding on the performance and carcass grading results of fattening pigs.2. There were four treatments. All pigs were given the same meal mixtures and were fed dry and ad lib. up to four different daily maximums, namely, 6½, 6, 5½ and 5 lb. meal/pig/day. There were five pens of nine group-fed pigs on each treatment, involving a total of 180 pigs. The pigs were on experiment from approximately 8 weeks of age to bacon weight. Comprehensive carcass measurements were made on all pigs.3. The results showed that as the level of feeding was decreased, the growth rate of the pigs, back fat thickness and belly thickness were reduced, and the depth and breadth of eye muscle were increased, while the efficiency of food utilization, carcass dressing percentage and carcass length were not markedly affected. Commercial grading results similarly improved as the level of feeding was reduced.4. It was concluded that under the conditions prevailing, the maximum daily meal allowance should be of the order of 5½ lb./pig in order to obtain relatively satisfactory carcass grading.5. Subdivision of the carcass measurement and commercial grading data according to sex of pig showed that in general at each level of feeding the carcasses of the female pigs were superior to those of the male animals.The possibilities of segregating pigs according to sex during fattening as a means whereby undue retardation in the growth rate of the females might be prevented without adversely affecting their carcass grading, was discussed.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Genetics,Agronomy and Crop Science,Animal Science and Zoology

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3