Abstract
AbstractThis article argues that the Supreme Court should not require a religious exemption from vaccine mandates. For children, who cannot yet make autonomous religious decision, religious exemptions would allow parents to make a choice that puts the child at risk and makes the shared environment of the school unsafe — risking other people’s children. For adults, there are still good reasons not to require a religious exemption, since vaccines mandates are adopted for public health reasons, not to target religion, are an area where free riding is a real risk, no religion actually prohibits vaccinating under a mandate, and policing religious exemptions is very difficult.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Health Policy,General Medicine,Issues, ethics and legal aspects
Reference113 articles.
1. The Case Against a Right to Religion-Based Exemptions;West;Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics, and Public Policy,1990
2. 93. Fulton, 141 S. Ct. at 1883-1926.
3. 75. Sherbert v. Verner, 374 U.S. 398, 405-409 (1963)
4. Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205, 207-209 (1972).
5. 10. Id. at 209.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献