From the Shadows: The Public Health Implications of the Supreme Court’s COVID-Free Exercise Cases-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

From the Shadows: The Public Health Implications of the Supreme Court’s COVID-Free Exercise Cases

Published:2021 Issue:4 Volume:49 Page:564-579
ISSN:1073-1105
Container-title:Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics
language:en
Short-container-title:J. Law. Med. Ethics

Author:

Parmet Wendy E.

Abstract

AbstractThis article analyzes the Supreme Court’s “shadow docket” Free Exercise cases relating to COVID-19. The paper highlights the decline of deference, the impact of exemptions, and the implications of the new doctrine for vaccine and other public health laws.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Health Policy,General Medicine,Issues, ethics and legal aspects

Reference188 articles.

1. 142. Id. at 1880 (2021)(Barrett J., concurring).

2. 10. Id. at 1008-1010.

3. 163. Tandon v. Newsom, 141 S. Ct. 1294, 1296 (citing Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn v. Cuomo, 141 S. Ct. 63, 66 (Gorsuch, J., concurring)).

4. ‘The Essential’ Free Exercise Clause;Blackman;Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy,2021

5. 107. Id.

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Judicial Decisions Constraining Public Health Powers During COVID-19: Implications For Public Health Policy Making;HEALTH AFFAIR;2024

2. Judicial Decisions Constraining Public Health Powers During COVID-19: Implications For Public Health Policy Making;Health Affairs;2024-06-01

3. Regulatory Choices and Legal Disputes in the Fight Against COVID-19 Infections in the Workplace: A Comparison of Vaccine Mandates in the Italian and US Contexts;Work Beyond the Pandemic;2023-11-22

4. Reproducing crises: Understanding the role of law in the COVID‐19 global pandemic;Law & Policy;2023-03-28

5. Judicial Review of Public Health Powers Since the Start of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Trends and Implications;American Journal of Public Health;2023-03