Aligning Research and the Current Practice of Performance Management

Author:

Ledford Gerald E.,Benson George,Lawler Edward E.

Abstract

The debate over eliminating performance ratings addresses many important theoretical and practical issues. However, the academic debate on the topic is disconnected from the concerns of practitioners. Knowledge gained from theory-driven research is not leading practice on the use of performance ratings, despite the large volume of potentially relevant research findings. Many organizations are charging ahead with performance management solutions that seem sensible to them. They may be interested in academic research, but they are not waiting for it. We will argue that academic researchers who hope to influence practice need to better understand the concerns of practitioners and the research opportunities that are presented by contemporary practice.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Applied Psychology,Social Psychology

Reference3 articles.

1. Getting Rid of Performance Ratings: Genius or Folly? A Debate

2. Organization of information in memory and the performance appraisal process: Evidence from the field.

3. Ledford G. , Benson G. , & Lawler E. (in press). A study of cutting edge performance management practices: Ongoing feedback, ratingless reviews, and crowd-sourced feedback. WorldatWork Journal.

Cited by 18 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Strategic Challenges of Human Resources Management in the Industry 6.0;Advances in Electronic Government, Digital Divide, and Regional Development;2024-01-24

2. Digitale Tools für smarte Personalarbeit;Smart HRM;2024

3. Performance Management and HR Appraisal System based on a Framework of BERT-BiGRUCNN- A Approach;2023 2nd International Conference on Automation, Computing and Renewable Systems (ICACRS);2023-12-11

4. The influence of performance-driven cultures on performance appraisal best practices effectiveness;International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management;2023-06-01

5. Leistungsbeurteilung in Zeiten der Digitalisierung;Digitale Personalauswahl und Eignungsdiagnostik;2023

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3