Author:
Ledford Gerald E.,Benson George,Lawler Edward E.
Abstract
The debate over eliminating performance ratings addresses many important theoretical and practical issues. However, the academic debate on the topic is disconnected from the concerns of practitioners. Knowledge gained from theory-driven research is not leading practice on the use of performance ratings, despite the large volume of potentially relevant research findings. Many organizations are charging ahead with performance management solutions that seem sensible to them. They may be interested in academic research, but they are not waiting for it. We will argue that academic researchers who hope to influence practice need to better understand the concerns of practitioners and the research opportunities that are presented by contemporary practice.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Applied Psychology,Social Psychology
Reference3 articles.
1. Getting Rid of Performance Ratings: Genius or Folly? A Debate
2. Organization of information in memory and the performance appraisal process: Evidence from the field.
3. Ledford G. , Benson G. , & Lawler E. (in press). A study of cutting edge performance management practices: Ongoing feedback, ratingless reviews, and crowd-sourced feedback. WorldatWork Journal.
Cited by
18 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献