1. The etymology recently proposed for this word by H. W. Bailey, BSOAS.,xi, 774, n. 1, would require -hrin the MPers. form. The absence of -h-from all other spellings, even that in the inscription of Shapur, is against *naxti-čiθra-.One would also hesitate to regard Sogdian nys′yras a loanword (the regular Sogdian form should end in -iš).
2. -pas in lyšp,etc., cf. Sogdica,58 and Add,
3. Chavannes–Pelliot Cf. , 24 [520], n. 1.
4. Misunderstood and misapplied as “ erect” in Persian.
5. Beruni′s Cf. remark, India,p. 59 end (transl., i, 123).