Abstract
Purpose
The analysis of existing institutional research proposal databases can provide novel insights into science funding parity. The purpose of this study was to analyze the relationship between race/ethnicity and extramural research proposal and award rates across a medical school faculty and to determine whether there was evidence that researchers changed their submission strategies because of differential inequities across submission categories.
Method
The authors performed an analysis of 14,263 biomedical research proposals with proposed start dates between 2010–2022 from the University of Michigan Medical School, measuring the proposal submission and award rates for each racial/ethnic group across 4 possible submission categories (R01 & Equivalent programs, other federal, industry, and non-profit).
Results
Researchers from each self-identified racial/ethnic group (Asian, Black/African American, Hispanic/Latino) pursued a different proposal submission strategy than the majority group (White). The authors found that Black/African American researchers experienced negative award rate differentials across all submission categories, which resulted in the lowest R01 & Equivalent and Other Federal submission rates of any racial/ethnic group and the highest submission rate to non-profit sources. The authors did not find support for the hypothesis that researchers changed submission strategies in response to award rate inequalities across submission categories.
Conclusions
Biomedical researchers from different racial/ethnic groups follow markedly different proposal submission strategies within the University of Michigan Medical School. There is also a clear relationship between race/ethnicity and rates of proposal award. Black/African American and Asian researchers appear disadvantaged across all submission categories relative to White researchers. This study can be easily replicated by other academic research institutions, revealing opportunities for positive intervention.
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference15 articles.
1. Higher education R&D expenditures, by source of funds: FYs 1953–2020 [Internet]. Alexandria (VA): National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, National Science Foundation (NSF). 2021 Dec 27 [cited 2022 April 11]. Available from https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsf22311/assets/data-tables/tables/nsf22311-tab001.pdf
2. Research Grants: Funding, by Mechanism. NIH Data Book Report ID: 43 [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Institutes of Health, (NIH). 2021 Feb [cited 2022 April 11]. Available from https://report.nih.gov/nihdatabook/report/43.
3. Race, ethnicity, and NIH research awards;DK Ginther;Science,2011
4. Gender, race/ethnicity, and National Institutes of Health R01 Research awards: is there evidence of a double bind for women of color?.;DK Ginther;Acad Med,2016
5. Topic choice contributes to the lower rate of NIH awards to African-American/black scientists;TA Hoppe;Science Advances,2019
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献