Award rate inequities in biomedical research

Author:

Zimmermann Alessandra,Klavans Richard,Offhaus Heather M.,Grieb Teri A.,Smith CalebORCID

Abstract

Purpose The analysis of existing institutional research proposal databases can provide novel insights into science funding parity. The purpose of this study was to analyze the relationship between race/ethnicity and extramural research proposal and award rates across a medical school faculty and to determine whether there was evidence that researchers changed their submission strategies because of differential inequities across submission categories. Method The authors performed an analysis of 14,263 biomedical research proposals with proposed start dates between 2010–2022 from the University of Michigan Medical School, measuring the proposal submission and award rates for each racial/ethnic group across 4 possible submission categories (R01 & Equivalent programs, other federal, industry, and non-profit). Results Researchers from each self-identified racial/ethnic group (Asian, Black/African American, Hispanic/Latino) pursued a different proposal submission strategy than the majority group (White). The authors found that Black/African American researchers experienced negative award rate differentials across all submission categories, which resulted in the lowest R01 & Equivalent and Other Federal submission rates of any racial/ethnic group and the highest submission rate to non-profit sources. The authors did not find support for the hypothesis that researchers changed submission strategies in response to award rate inequalities across submission categories. Conclusions Biomedical researchers from different racial/ethnic groups follow markedly different proposal submission strategies within the University of Michigan Medical School. There is also a clear relationship between race/ethnicity and rates of proposal award. Black/African American and Asian researchers appear disadvantaged across all submission categories relative to White researchers. This study can be easily replicated by other academic research institutions, revealing opportunities for positive intervention.

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference15 articles.

1. Higher education R&D expenditures, by source of funds: FYs 1953–2020 [Internet]. Alexandria (VA): National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, National Science Foundation (NSF). 2021 Dec 27 [cited 2022 April 11]. Available from https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsf22311/assets/data-tables/tables/nsf22311-tab001.pdf

2. Research Grants: Funding, by Mechanism. NIH Data Book Report ID: 43 [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Institutes of Health, (NIH). 2021 Feb [cited 2022 April 11]. Available from https://report.nih.gov/nihdatabook/report/43.

3. Race, ethnicity, and NIH research awards;DK Ginther;Science,2011

4. Gender, race/ethnicity, and National Institutes of Health R01 Research awards: is there evidence of a double bind for women of color?.;DK Ginther;Acad Med,2016

5. Topic choice contributes to the lower rate of NIH awards to African-American/black scientists;TA Hoppe;Science Advances,2019

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3