Reporting of Observational Studies Explicitly Aiming to Emulate Randomized Trials

Author:

Hansford Harrison J.12,Cashin Aidan G.12,Jones Matthew D.12,Swanson Sonja A.345,Islam Nazrul67,Douglas Susan R. G.1,Rizzo Rodrigo R. N.12,Devonshire Jack J.2,Williams Sam A.2,Dahabreh Issa J.458,Dickerman Barbra A.45,Egger Matthias91011,Garcia-Albeniz Xabier512,Golub Robert M.13,Lodi Sara414,Moreno-Betancur Margarita1516,Pearson Sallie-Anne17,Schneeweiss Sebastian18,Sterne Jonathan A. C.192021,Sharp Melissa K.22,Stuart Elizabeth A.23,Hernán Miguel A.458,Lee Hopin2425,McAuley James H.12

Affiliation:

1. School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia

2. Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia

3. Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

4. CAUSALab, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts

5. Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts

6. Oxford Population Health, Big Data Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom

7. Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom

8. Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts

9. Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland

10. Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa

11. Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom

12. RTI Health Solutions, Barcelona, Spain

13. Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois

14. Department of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts

15. Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics Unit, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Royal Children’s Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia

16. Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia

17. School of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

18. Division of Pharmacoepidemiology, Department of Medicine, Brigham & Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

19. Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom

20. NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, Bristol, United Kingdom

21. Health Data Research UK South-West, Bristol, United Kingdom

22. Department of Public Health and Epidemiology, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland

23. Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland

24. University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, United Kingdom

25. EMEA Methods & Evidence Generation, IQVIA, London, United Kingdom

Abstract

ImportanceObservational (nonexperimental) studies that aim to emulate a randomized trial (ie, the target trial) are increasingly informing medical and policy decision-making, but it is unclear how these studies are reported in the literature. Consistent reporting is essential for quality appraisal, evidence synthesis, and translation of evidence to policy and practice.ObjectiveTo assess the reporting of observational studies that explicitly aimed to emulate a target trial.Evidence ReviewWe searched Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, and Web of Science for observational studies published between March 2012 and October 2022 that explicitly aimed to emulate a target trial of a health or medical intervention. Two reviewers double-screened and -extracted data on study characteristics, key predefined components of the target trial protocol and its emulation (eligibility criteria, treatment strategies, treatment assignment, outcome[s], follow-up, causal contrast[s], and analysis plan), and other items related to the target trial emulation.FindingsA total of 200 studies that explicitly aimed to emulate a target trial were included. These studies included 26 subfields of medicine, and 168 (84%) were published from January 2020 to October 2022. The aim to emulate a target trial was explicit in 70 study titles (35%). Forty-three studies (22%) reported use of a published reporting guideline (eg, Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology). Eighty-five studies (43%) did not describe all key items of how the target trial was emulated and 113 (57%) did not describe the protocol of the target trial and its emulation.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this systematic review of 200 studies that explicitly aimed to emulate a target trial, reporting of how the target trial was emulated was inconsistent. A reporting guideline for studies explicitly aiming to emulate a target trial may improve the reporting of the target trial protocols and other aspects of these emulation attempts.

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

Subject

General Medicine

Cited by 13 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3