Replacement Strategies for Tunneled Hemodialysis Catheters with Complications

Author:

Lazarus Benjamin12ORCID,Kotwal Sradha34ORCID,Gallagher Martin35ORCID,Gray Nicholas A.67ORCID,Coggan Sarah3,Talaulikar Girish89,Polkinghorne Kevan R.1210ORCID,

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia

2. Department of Nephrology, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia

3. The George Institute for Global Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

4. Prince of Wales Hospital, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

5. South Western Sydney Campus, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

6. Sunshine Coast University Hospital, Birtinya, Queensland, Australia

7. School of Health, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, Queensland, Australia

8. Department of Nephrology, The Canberra Hospital, Garran, Australian Capital Territory, Australia

9. Australian National University School of Medicine, Acton, Australian Capital Territory, Australia

10. School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Prahran, Victoria, Australia

Abstract

Key Points Replacement strategies for hemodialysis catheters with mechanical failure differed widely between services, which suggests clinical equipoise.For mechanical hemodialysis catheter failure, exchange did not result in more dysfunction or infection than removal and separate replacement.In Australia, infected catheters were almost universally removed and then replaced through a separate tunnel tract. Background Tunneled hemodialysis catheters often have infectious or mechanical complications that require unplanned removal and replacement, but the optimal replacement strategy is unknown. This study described the real-world use of two strategies in Australia and compared the survival of replacement catheters inserted by either strategy. Methods Observational data from the REDUcing the burden of dialysis Catheter ComplicaTIOns: a National approach trial, which enrolled a nationwide cohort of 6400 adults who received an incident hemodialysis catheter (2016–2020), was used for this secondary analysis. Tunneled catheters were replaced by either catheter exchange through the existing tunnel tract or removal and replacement through a new tract. The effect of the replacement strategy on the time to catheter removal because of infection or dysfunction was estimated by emulating a hypothetical pragmatic randomized trial among a subset of 434 patients with mechanical tunneled catheter failure. Results Of 9974 tunneled hemodialysis catheters inserted during the trial, 380 had infectious and 945 had mechanical complications that required replacement. Almost all infected hemodialysis catheters (97%) were removed and separately replaced through a new tunnel tract, whereas nephrology services differed widely in their replacement practices for catheters with mechanical failure (median=50% guidewire exchanged, interquartile range=30%–67%). Service-level differences accounted for 29% of the residual variation after adjusting for patient factors. In the target trial emulation cohort of patients with mechanical catheter failure (n=434 patients), catheter exchange was not associated with lower complication-free survival at 1, 6, or 12 months (counterfactual survival difference at 1 month=5.9%; 95% confidence interval, −2% to 14%). Conclusions Guidewire exchange for mechanical failure of catheter was not associated with lower catheter survival and may be preferable for patients. Trial registration and protocol: The trial was registered in the Australia and New Zealand clinical trials registry on the June 23, 2016 (ACTRN12616000830493).

Funder

National Health and Medical Research Council

Monash University

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Reference45 articles.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Target Trial Framework;Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology;2024-08-06

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3