Concurrent validity and reliability of cephalometric analysis using smartphone apps and computer software-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Concurrent validity and reliability of cephalometric analysis using smartphone apps and computer software

Published:2019-07-08 Issue:6 Volume:89 Page:889-896
ISSN:0003-3219
Container-title:The Angle Orthodontist
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Livas Christos¹,Delli Konstantina²,Spijkervet Frederik K. L.³,Vissink Arjan⁴,Dijkstra Pieter U.⁵

Affiliation:

1. Associate Professor and Vice Chair, Department of Orthodontics, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam and VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, and Dental Clinics Zwolle, Zwolle, the Netherlands

2. Assistant Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands

3. Professor and Chair, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands

4. Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands

5. Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands, and Department of Rehabilitation, Center for Rehabilitation, University of Groningen, University Medical Center, Groningen, the Netherlands

Abstract

ABSTRACTObjectives:To assess the diagnostic accuracy of two smartphone cephalometric analysis apps compared with Viewbox software.Materials and Methods:Pretreatment digital lateral cephalograms of 50 consecutive orthodontic patients (20 males, 30 females; mean age, 19.1 years; SD, 11.7) were traced twice using two apps (ie, CephNinja and OneCeph), with Viewbox used as the gold standard computer software program. Seven angular and two linear measurements, originally derived from Steiner cephalometric analysis, were performed.Results:Regarding validity, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) ranged from .903–.983 and .786–.978 for OneCeph vs Viewbox and CephNinja vs Viewbox, respectively. The ICC values for intratool reliability ranged from .647–.993. None of the CephNinja measurements was below the recommended cutoff values of ICCs for reliability.Conclusions:OneCeph has a high validity compared with Viewbox, while CephNinja is the best alternative to Viewbox regarding reliability. Smartphone apps may have a great potential in supplementing traditional cephalometric analysis.

Publisher

The Angle Orthodontist (EH Angle Education & Research Foundation)

Subject

Orthodontics

Link

http://meridian.allenpress.com/angle-orthodontist/article-pdf/89/6/889/2367291/021919-124_1.pdf

Cited by 29 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Comparative Evaluation of Digital Cephalometric Tracing Applications on Mobile Devices and Manual Tracing;Medical Science Monitor;2024-05-21

2. Informatic tools for diagnosis in dentistry. A compilation review;2024-05-06

3. Accuracy and tracing time of cephalometric analyses on a tablet or desktop computer;Head & Face Medicine;2024-02-12

4. A Comparison of Smartphone-assisted and Computer Software Assisted Tracing with the Conventional Manual Method;Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society;2024-02-06

5. Assessment of landmark detection in cephalometric radiographs with different conditions of brightness and contrast using the an artificial intelligence software;Dentomaxillofacial Radiology;2023-10-23