Evaluation of Antagonism Activity and Control of Vibrio alginolyticus in Artemia Culture Using Mixed Probiotic
-
Published:2021-02-24
Issue:1
Volume:44
Page:
-
ISSN:2231-8542
-
Container-title:Pertanika Journal of Tropical Agricultural Science
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:JTAS
Author:
Chean Mei Yun Beryl,Puvanasundram Puvaneswari,Yaminudin Jasmin,Karim Murni
Abstract
Supplementation with mixed probiotic in aquaculture has been proven to benefit the hosts as disease resistance tool. In this study, a mixed probiotic which consisted of three isolated strains (Lysinibacillus fusiformis strain SPS11, A2, and Bacillus megaterium strain I24) was formulated for the in vitro assays against Vibrio alginolyticus and in vivo preliminary study towards Artemia nauplii. These strains showed antagonism activities against V. alginolyticus in in vitro assay. An increase in biofilm formation of this mixed probiotic was observed which indicated that the strains could work synergistically with each other to confer benefits to the hosts. Enrichment of Artemia nauplii with the formulated mixed probiotic was done to investigate its role in enhancing resistance against the V. alginolyticus. Artemia nauplii were cultured in two different concentrations of mixed probiotic (106 and 108 CFU mL-1) and challenged via immersion method. The mixed probiotic at both concentrations resulted in significantly higher survival of Artemia compared to the challenged group with no probiont added (106 CFU mL-1, 65.00 ± 0.00 % and 108 CFU mL-1, 77.50 ± 3.53 %). Significant reduction of Vibrio loads was observed in Artemia and its culture water supplemented with mixed probiotic at 108 CFU mL-1 whereas there was no reduction of Vibrio at 106 CFU mL-1. This study suggests that the usage of formulated mixed probiotic at high concentration (108 CFU mL-1) as opposed to single-strain probiotic can confer protection against V. alginolyticus infection towards Artemia.
Publisher
Universiti Putra Malaysia
Subject
Plant Science,Forestry
Reference49 articles.
1. Abideen, S., & Babuselvam, M. (2014). Antagonistic activity of Lysinibacillus fusiformis n 139 strain isolated from marine fish Triacanthus strigilifer and genome sequence. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 3(4), 1066-1072. 2. Adebo, O., Njobeh, P., & Mavumengwana, V. (2016). Degradation and detoxification of AFB1 by Staphylocococcus warneri, Sporosarcina sp. and Lysinibacillus fusiformis. Food Control, 68, 92-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.03.021 3. Ahmad, V., Muhammad Zafar Iqbal, A., Haseeb, M., & Khan, M. (2014). Antimicrobial potential of bacteriocin producing Lysinibacillus jx416856 against foodborne bacterial and fungal pathogens, isolated from fruits and vegetable waste. Anaerobe, 27, 87-95. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.anaerobe.2014.04.001 4. Al-Thubiani, A., Maher, Y., Fathi, A., Abourehab, M., Alarjah, M., Khan, M., & Al- Ghamdi, S. (2018). Identification and characterization of a novel antimicrobial peptide compound produced by Bacillus megaterium strain isolated from oral microflora. Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal, 26(8), 1089-1097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsps.2018.05.019 5. Amin, M., Rakhisi, Z., & Zarei Ahmady, A. (2015). Isolation and identification of Bacillus species from soil and evaluation of their antibacterial properties. Avicenna Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infection, 2(1), 23233. https://doi.org/10.17795/ajcmi-23233
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|