Interferences in immunoassays: review and practical algorithm
Author:
Wauthier Loris1ORCID, Plebani Mario2ORCID, Favresse Julien13
Affiliation:
1. Department of Laboratory Medicine , Clinique St-Luc Bouge , Namur , Belgium 2. Department of Laboratory Medicine , University-Hospital of Padova , Padova , Italy 3. Department of Pharmacy , Namur Research Institute for LIfes Sciences, University of Namur , Namur , Belgium
Abstract
Abstract
Immunoassays are currently the methods of choice for the measurement of a large panel of complex and heterogenous molecules owing to full automation, short turnaround time, high specificity and sensitivity. Despite remarkable performances, immunoassays are prone to several types of interferences that may lead to harmful consequences for the patient (e.g., prescription of an inadequate treatment, delayed diagnosis, unnecessary invasive investigations). A systematic search is only performed for some interferences because of its impracticality in clinical laboratories as it would notably impact budget, turnaround time, and human resources. Therefore, a case-by-case approach is generally preferred when facing an aberrant result. Hereby, we review the current knowledge on immunoassay interferences and present an algorithm for interference workup in clinical laboratories, from suspecting their presence to using the appropriate tests to identify them. We propose an approach to rationalize the attitude of laboratory specialists when faced with a potential interference and emphasize the importance of their collaboration with clinicians and manufacturers to ensure future improvements.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
Biochemistry (medical),Clinical Biochemistry,General Medicine
Reference110 articles.
1. Sturgeon, CM, Viljoen, A. Analytical error and interference in immunoassay: minimizing risk. Ann Clin Biochem 2011;48:418–32, https://doi.org/10.1258/acb.2011.011073. 2. Ward, G, Simpson, A, Boscato, L, Hickman, PE. The investigation of interferences in immunoassay. Clin Biochem 2017;50:1306–11, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2017.08.015. 3. Kricka, LJ, PJ. Immunochemical techniques. In: Rifai, N, Horvath, AR, Wittwer, C, editors. Tietz textbook of clinical chemistry and molecular biology, 6th ed. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier; 2017:348–67 pp. 4. Clerico, A, Belloni, L, Carrozza, C, Correale, M, Dittadi, R, Dotti, C, et al.. A Black Swan in clinical laboratory practice: the analytical error due to interferences in immunoassay methods. Clin Chem Lab Med 2018;56:397–402, https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2017-0881. 5. Constantinescu, G, Bidlingmaier, M, Gruber, M, Peitzsch, M, Poitz, DM, van Herwaarden, AE, et al.. Mass spectrometry reveals misdiagnosis of primary aldosteronism with scheduling for adrenalectomy due to immunoassay interference. Clin Chim Acta 2020;507:98–103, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2020.04.019.
Cited by
43 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|