Affiliation:
1. School of Philosophy , University College Dublin , Dublin , Ireland
Abstract
Abstract
This is an account of Sceptical investigation as it is presented by Sextus Empiricus. I focus attention on the motivation behind the Sceptic’s investigation, the goal of that investigation, and on the development Sextus describes from proto-Sceptical to Sceptical investigator. I suggest that recent accounts of the Sceptic’s investigative practice do not make sufficient sense of the fact that the Sceptic finds a relief from disturbance by way of suspending judgement, nor of the apparent continuity between proto-Sceptical and Sceptical investigation. I offer an alternative account which turns on the suggestion that the Sceptic accepts that justification is the norm of belief.
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,Philosophy
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Skeptical Suspension in the Face of Disagreement;Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie;2024-06-11
2. Hegel’s Criticism of Pyrrhonism;International Journal for the Study of Skepticism;2024-02-23
3. Schulze's Scepticism and the Rise and Rise of German Idealism;Metaphysics as a Science in Classical German Philosophy;2023-08-04
4. Sextus and the Nature of Suspension;Philosophia;2023-07-29