Abstract
AbstractThis article is an investigation of the nature of suspension of judgement as it is conceived by Sextus Empiricus. I carry out this investigation by examining what I take to be Sextus’ most pertinent remarks on the topic and by considering them in the context of contemporary philosophical work on the nature of suspension. Against the more frequently encountered idea that Sextus is operating with a privative conception of suspension, I argue that Sextus instead has a metacognitive account of suspension, whereby suspending constitutively involves acknowledging that one is not in a position to tell whether or not p.
Funder
Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg im Breisgau
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference31 articles.
1. Atkins, P. (2017). A Russellian account of suspended judgment. Synthese, 194(8), 3021–3046.
2. Barnes, J. (2000) Introduction. In Sextus Empiricus, Outlines of Scepticism (trans: Annas, J., & Barnes, J.). (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. xi–xxxi.
3. Bett, R. (2019). How to be a pyrrhonist: The practice and significance of Pyrrhonian skepticism. Cambridge University Press.
4. Burnyeat, M. (1997). Can the sceptic live his Scepticism. In M. Burnyeat & M. Frede (Eds.), The original sceptics: A controversy (pp. 25–57). Hackett.
5. Dunphy, R. (2022). From proto-sceptic to sceptic in Sextus’ outlines of Pyrrhonism. Apeiron: A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science, 55(3), 455–484.