Ironic speakers, vigilant hearers-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Ironic speakers, vigilant hearers

Published:2023-04-01 Issue:2 Volume:20 Page:111-132
ISSN:1612-295X
Container-title:Intercultural Pragmatics
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Mazzarella Diana¹,Pouscoulous Nausicaa²

Affiliation:

1. University of Neuchâtel , Neuchâtel , Switzerland

2. University College London , London , UK

Abstract

AbstractVerbal irony characteristically involves the expression of a derogatory, dissociative attitude. The ironical speaker is not only stating a blatant falsehood or irrelevant proposition; she is also communicating her stance towards its epistemic status. The centrality of attitude recognition in irony understanding opens up the question of which cognitive abilities make it possible. Drawing on Wilson (2009), we provide a full-fledged account of the role of epistemic vigilance in irony understanding and suggest that it relies on the exercise of first- and second-order vigilance towards the content, the ironic speaker as well as the source of the irony.

Funder

SNSF Eccellenza

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Linguistics and Language,Communication,Language and Linguistics

Link

https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/ip-2023-2001/pdf

Reference77 articles.

1. Ackerman, Brian P. 1981. Young children’s understanding of a speaker’s intentional use of a false utterance. Developmental Psychology 17. 472–480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.17.4.472.

2. Altay, Sacha & Hugo Mercier. 2020. Relevance is socially rewarded, but not at the price of accuracy. Evolutionary Psychology 18(1). 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704920912640.

3. Baron-Cohen, Simon, Alan M. Leslie & Utah Frith. 1985. Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind”. Cognition 21(1). 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(85)90022-8.

4. Bühler, Daniela, Alexandra Perovic & Nausicaa Pouscoulous. 2018. Comprehension of novel metaphor in young children with Developmental Language Disorder. Autism & Developmental Language Impairments 3. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2396941518817229.

5. Caillies, Stéphanie, Vincine Bertot, Jacques Motte, Christine Raynaud & Michel Abely. 2014. Social cognition in ADHD: Irony understanding and recursive theory of mind. Research in Developmental Disabilities 35(11). 3191–3198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2014.08.002.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. “Irony is easy to understand ”: The role of emoji in irony detection;Intercultural Pragmatics;2023-11-01

2. More than one path to pragmatics? Insights from children's grasp of implicit, figurative and ironical meaning;Cognition;2023-11