Evaluation of stigmatized properties-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Evaluation of stigmatized properties

Published:2017-12-20 Issue:1 Volume:9 Page:1615-1626
ISSN:1847-6228
Container-title:Organization, Technology and Management in Construction: an International Journal
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Hajnal István¹

Affiliation:

1. Budapesti Muszaki es Gazdasagtudomanyi Egyetem , Budapest , Hungary

Abstract

Abstract Stigmatized property is real estate burdened with an external negative effect. Individual cases are spread along a broad spectrum, along many dimensions that include the rational and the irrational, the acute and the chronic. Examples for the stigmatizing effect are a nearby airport, ground water contaminated by chemicals, presence of a high-voltage power line, and so on. Evaluation of these properties needs special methodology. Stigma can reduce the property’s market value through a particular, multi-layered filter. The author systematically examines the professional literature’s cases of evaluation of stigmatized properties. The research aims to organize and compare the cases in order to calculate the market value of stigmatized properties. Based on the analysis, six significant dimensions are identified. A focus group of 19 experts examined and individually evaluated the stigmatizing effects along these different dimensions. The author suggests that it is possible to estimate the stigma’s effect and compare different cases to one another effectively. The results allow the international methodology of valuation to be processed.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Strategy and Management,Building and Construction,Civil and Structural Engineering

Reference58 articles.

1. Affuso, E., de Parisot, C., Ho, C., & Hite, D. (2010). The impact of hazardous waste on property values: The effect of lead pollution. Urbani izziv, 21(2), p. 2010. doi: 10.5379/urbani-izziv-en-2010-21-02-005.

2. Andersson, H., Jonsson, L., & Ögren, M. (2010). Property prices and exposure to multiple noise sources: Hedonic regression with road and railway noise. Environmental and Resource Economics, 45(1), pp. 73–89.

3. Baranzini, A., Schaerer, C., Ramirez, J. V., & Thalmann, P. (2008). ‘Feel it or measure it. Percieved vs. measured noise in hedonic models’. In: EAERE 16th Annual Conference, June, 25–28, 2008, Gothenburg, Sweden.

4. Batalhone, S., Nogueira, J., & Mueller, B. (2002). Economics of Air Pollution: Hedonic Price Model and Smell Consequences of Sewage Treatment Plants in Urban Areas, Department of Economics Working Paper 234, University of Brasilia.

5. Bateman, I., Day, B., Lake, I., & Lovett, A. (2001). The Effect of Road Traffic on Residential Property Values: A Literature Review and Hedonic Pricing Study. Report to the Scottish Executive Development Department. School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. A CONCEPTUAL PAPER ON STIGMATISED DIMENSION TOWARDS RESIDENTIAL OVERHANG;PLANNING MALAYSIA;2024-07-29

2. Modelling Property Overhang Using Stigmatised Property Dimensions;Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal;2024-02-24

3. Stigmatized Properties: Filter Theory;IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering;2022-01-01

4. Market value of the view restriction;Organization, Technology and Management in Construction: an International Journal;2019-02-01