Market value of the view restriction
-
Published:2019-02-01
Issue:1
Volume:11
Page:1925-1932
-
ISSN:1847-6228
-
Container-title:Organization, Technology and Management in Construction: an International Journal
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:
Affiliation:
1. Department of Construction, Technology and Management, Faculty of Architecture , Budapest University of Technology and Economics , P.O.B. 91, H-1521 , Budapest , Hungary
Abstract
Abstract
Based on the international literature, the effect of an existing panoramic view on the market value of properties is positive and significant. This value-adding factor varies by location and by type of view. In Central Europe, no such evaluation study has been elaborated until now. New building construction may restrict the existing panorama, and this is the other side of the same phenomenon. View restriction may result in stigmatization, which is a negative effect on the property. There are two major methodologies to observe the effect: revealed preference method (RPM) and stated preference method (SPM). One SPM approach is contingent valuation (CV), wherein well-informed stakeholders give their opinion about the impact caused by the investigated effect. The CV methodology, using the Delphi approach, was employed to observe the market value decrease in the cases of several restricted panorama situations in Budapest. Based on the research, this effect in Budapest is in line with the published western results. The result of the study can be used to support real estate developers and architects in their development decisions. This is an extended version of the article titled “The impact of view-restriction: a Delphi case study from Budapest”, presented at Creative Construction Conference 2018, CCC 2017, 30 June to 3 July 2018, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Strategy and Management,Building and Construction,Civil and Structural Engineering
Reference27 articles.
1. Baranzini, A., & Schaerer, C. (2011). A sight for sore eyes: Assessing the value of view and land use in the housing market. Journal of Housing Economics, 20(3), pp. 191–199. 2. Benson, E. D., Hansen, J. L., Schwartz, A. L., & Smersh, G. T. (1998). Pricing residential amenities: The value of a view. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 16(1), pp. 55–73. 3. Bourassa, S. C., Hoesli, M., & Sun, J. (2004). What’s in a view? Environment and Planning A, 36(8), pp. 1427–1450. 4. Brown, G. M., & Pollakowski, H. O. (1977). Economic valuation of shoreline. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 59, pp. 272–278. 5. Chau, K. W., Yiu, C. Y. E., Wong, S. K., & Lai, L. W. C. (2002). Hedonic price modelling of environmental attributes: A review of the literature and a Hong Kong case study. In: Ng, Y. K., & Wills, I. (eds.), Welfare Economics and Sustainable Development. I–II. Eolss Publishers Company Limited, Oxford, UK.
|
|