Preanalytical quality improvement: in quality we trust

Author:

Lippi Giuseppe12,Becan-McBride Kathleen3,Behúlová Darina4,Bowen Raffick A.5,Church Stephen6,Delanghe Joris7,Grankvist Kjell8,Kitchen Steve9,Nybo Mads10,Nauck Matthias11,Nikolac Nora12,Palicka Vladimir13,Plebani Mario14,Sandberg Sverre15,Simundic Ana-Maria1216

Affiliation:

1. Clinical Chemistry and Hematology Laboratory, Academic Hospital of Parma , Parma , Italy

2. U.O. Diagnostica Ematochimica, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma, Via Gramsci 14, 43126 , Parma , Italy

3. Department of Family and Community Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston , TX , United States of America

4. Department of Laboratory Medicine, Comenius University Children’s Hospital , Bratislava , Slovakia

5. Clinical Chemistry and Immunology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford , CA , United States of America

6. BD Diagnostics – Preanalytical Systems , Oxford , United Kingdom

7. Department Clinical Chemistry, Ghent University Hospital , Ghent , Belgium

8. Department of Medical Biosciences, Clinical Chemistry, Umea University , Umea , Sweden

9. Sheffield Haemophilia and Thrombosis Centre, Royal Hallamshire Hospital , Sheffield , United Kingdom

10. Department of Clinical Biochemistry and Pharmacology, Odense University Hospital , Odense , Denmark

11. Institut für Klinische Chemie und Laboratoriumsmedizin, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald , Greifswald , Germany

12. University Department of Chemistry, Sestre Milosrdnice University Hospital , Zagreb , Croatia

13. Charles University in Prague, University Hospital and School of Medicine Hradec Kralove , Hradec Kralove , Czech Republic

14. Department of Laboratory Medicine, University-Hospital , Padua , Italy

15. Laboratory of Clinical Biochemistry, Haukeland University Hospital , Bergen , Norway

16. Chair of the EFLM working group WG-Preanalytical phase , Oxford , United Kingdom

Abstract

Abstract Total quality in laboratory medicine should be defined as the guarantee that each activity throughout the total testing process is correctly performed, providing valuable medical decision-making and effective patient care. In the past decades, a 10-fold reduction in the analytical error rate has been achieved thanks to improvements in both reliability and standardization of analytical techniques, reagents, and instrumentation. Notable advances in information technology, quality control and quality assurance methods have also assured a valuable contribution for reducing diagnostic errors. Nevertheless, several lines of evidence still suggest that most errors in laboratory diagnostics fall outside the analytical phase, and the pre- and postanalytical steps have been found to be much more vulnerable. This collective paper, which is the logical continuum of the former already published in this journal 2 years ago, provides additional contribution to risk management in the preanalytical phase and is a synopsis of the lectures of the 2nd European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM)-Becton Dickinson (BD) European Conference on Preanalytical Phase meeting entitled “Preanalytical quality improvement: in quality we trust” (Zagreb, Croatia, 1–2 March 2013). The leading topics that will be discussed include quality indicators for preanalytical phase, phlebotomy practices for collection of blood gas analysis and pediatric samples, lipemia and blood collection tube interferences, preanalytical requirements of urinalysis, molecular biology hemostasis and platelet testing, as well as indications on best practices for safe blood collection. Auditing of the preanalytical phase by ISO assessors and external quality assessment for preanalytical phase are also discussed.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Biochemistry (medical),Clinical Biochemistry,General Medicine

Reference67 articles.

1. Barletta G, Zaninotto M, Faggian D, Plebani M. Shop for quality or quantity? Volumes and costs in clinical laboratories. Clin Chem Lab Med. [Epub ahead of print]. DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2012-0415.10.1515/cclm-2012-0415

2. Lippi G, Mattiuzzi C. Testing volume is not synonymous of cost, value and efficacy in laboratory diagnostics. Clin Chem Lab Med [Epub ahead of print]. DOI 10.1515/cclm-2012-0502.10.1515/cclm-2012-0502

3. Lippi G, Simundic AM, Mattiuzzi C. Overview on patient safety in healthcare and laboratory diagnostics. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2010;20:131–43.10.11613/BM.2010.015

4. Buttell P, Hendler R, Daley J. Quality in healthcare: concepts and practice. Westport: Praeger, 2008:62–83.

5. Lippi G, Plebani M, Simundic AM. Quality in laboratory diagnostics: from theory to practice. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2010;20:126–30.10.11613/BM.2010.014

Cited by 147 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3