Abstract
In this study, a milling experiment was performed, with 3x13 steel selected as the experimental material along with TiAlN coated inserts. The Box-Behnken method was used to design the experimental matrix with a total of eighteen experiments. Cutting speed, feed amount, and depth of cut were selected as the input parameters. Three regression models of surface roughness have been established, one using the experimentally measured surface texture, one using the Johnson transform to convert the surface texture data, and one using Box-Cox transformation to convert the surface texture data. A comparison of the accuracy of the three models was performed. The results show that the model using the Box-Cox transformation has the highest accuracy, followed by the model using the Johnson transformation. In addition, the influence of cutting parameters on surface roughness is also discussed in detail.
Publisher
Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research
Reference20 articles.
1. A. Dean, D. Voss, and D. Draguljić, Design and Analysis of Experiments. Springer, 2017.
2. J. Antony, Design of Experiments for Engineers and Scientists, 2nd ed. Oxford, UK: Elsevier, 2014.
3. T. H. Le, V. B. Pham and T. D. Hoang, "Surface Finish Comparison of Dry and Coolant Fluid High-Speed Milling of JIS SDK61 Mould Steel," Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 8023–8028, Feb. 2022.
4. R. M. Sakia, "The Box-Cox Transformation Technique: A Review," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series D (The Statistician), vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 169–178, 1992.
5. W. M. A. W. Ahmad, N. N. Naing, and N. A.Halim, "An appliciation of Box-Cox transformation to biostatics experiment data," Journal of Bioscience, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 137–145, 2008.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献