Consensus moderation: the voices of expert academics-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Consensus moderation: the voices of expert academics

Published:2023-01-02 Issue:7 Volume:48 Page:926-937
ISSN:0260-2938
Container-title:Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
language:en
Short-container-title:Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education

Author:

Mason Jaci¹^ORCID,Roberts Lynne D.²^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Medicine, University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, Western Australia

2. Curtin School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia

Publisher

Informa UK Limited

Subject

Education

Link

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/02602938.2022.2161999

Reference33 articles.

1. Identifying discourses of moderation in higher education

2. Barrie S. C. Hughes G. Crisp and A. Bennison. 2014. “Assessing and assuring Australian graduate learning outcomes: principles and practices within and across disciplines.” Office for Learning and Teaching . https://ltr.edu.au/resources/SP10_1879_Barrie_Report%20_2013.pdf.

3. Can a rubric do more than be transparent? Invitation as a new metaphor for assessment criteria

4. Assessment moderation in an Australian context: processes, practices, and challenges

5. Marking and moderation in the UK: false assumptions and wasted resources

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Behind the grades: co-constructing fairness to reach agreement in evaluative judgement;Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education;2024-07-21

2. Understanding the processes, practices and influences of calibration on feedback literacy in higher education marking: A qualitative study;Nurse Education Today;2024-04

3. Social moderation and calibration versus codification: a way forward for academic standards in higher education?;Studies in Higher Education;2024-02-26