The Response of Doctors to a Formal Complaint

Author:

Nash Louise1,Curtis Bradley2,Walton Merrilyn3,Willcock Simon4,Tennant Christopher5

Affiliation:

1. Psychiatrist, Lecturer, Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia

2. Associate Lecturer, Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia

3. Associate Professor of Ethical Practice, Office of Teaching and Learning in Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia

4. Associate Dean (Curriculum) and Associate Professor, Discipline of General Practice, University of Sydney Medical Program, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia

5. Professor of Psychiatry, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia

Abstract

Objectives: This pilot study investigates the psychological impact on doctors of a complaint to the New South Wales Health Care Complaints Commission and the doctor's perception of legal risk. Method: Doctors who received a complaint were sent a set of questionnaires embracing psychological variables and their perceptions of legal risk. Results: The response rate was 60%. Thirty-eight per cent of respondents met screening criteria for psychiatric disorder. There was, however, minimal functional impairment of work, social or family life. Respondents scored highly on altruism, but at the same time were ‘tough minded’. The questionnaire to assess the doctor's perception of legal risk appeared to have acceptable construct validity but showed that doctors still misunderstand medico-legal risk. Conclusions: Psychiatric morbidity rates of our sample were comparable with other Australian medical samples. This small sample appeared to cope with the stress of a complaint better than those reported in other studies.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health

Reference31 articles.

1. 1. NSW Health Care Complaints Commission, Annual Report 1998–1999.

2. 2. NSW Health Care Complaints Commission, Annual Report 2000–2001.

3. 3. NSW Health Care Complaints Commission, Annual Report 2002–2003.

4. Patients' complaints about medical practice

5. The Psychological Impact of Complaints and Negligence Suits on Doctors

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3